ANALYSIS: Is it time to change the name of Africa?

Expert suggests Africans reclaim their self-identity which was muddied by slave trade and colonisation.

Setting out to find out why Africa is called Africa, we expected it would be the simplest of the 5 “questions people frequently put to Google” we answered to mark Africa Day. But it turned out to be much more complicated.

After talking to history scholars, we discovered there was consensus on only two facts: that the name “Africa” is a foreign construct and that there is no agreement on its origins.

Everything after that was a stimulating academic – and geographic – adventure.

Term widely used since the Roman time

The word “Africa” does not have an African origin, Thierno Bah, professor emeritus at the University of Yaounde and an author of several books on African history, told Africa Check.

Bah also said there is no agreement on the sources and meanings of the word. He noted a link to the name of the Banu Ifren tribe of Berbers, whose ancestors were variously known as Ifren, Iforen, Ifuraces or Afer.

With the arrival of the Arabs, Banu Ifren became known as the inhabitants of Ifriqiya, a possibly Arabic transliteration of the word Africa and which today covers Tunisia and Algeria, Bah said.

Bah further linked the name to the Latin word afer, whose plural is ifri. Afer could be translated as “take away”, that is, the African “should be taken away by Latin citizens”.

“The term afer appears in European languages by way of the Romans who used it to indicate the northern part of the black continent,” Bah, a founding member of the Association of African Historians, said.

“It seems that the term Africa was widely used since the Roman time, initially to refer to northern Africa, socially dominated by a Berber population, before spreading to cover all of the continent at the end of the first century CE,” he said.

There are other possible origins, he added. In Campania (a region of southern Italy) the word africus indicated a rainy wind from the region of Carthage (modern day Tunis).

To further throw a spanner in the works, Bah noted that the southern part of the continent, occupied for the greater part by black people, was called Ethiopia, not Africa.

Controversial Egyptian link proposed

Prof Djénéba Traoré, the director of the Cape Verde-based West Africa Institute, said that the name Africa refers to foreign domination, contrary to the name “Europe” which is the product of a powerful mythology and culture.

“Europeans, especially Greeks, who went to Egypt since antiquity to broaden their knowledge, used the word ‘Ethiopians’, meaning ‘burned face’, to name the inhabitants of that region.

“There is evidence that at that time most Egyptians had dark skin, as Cheikh Anta Diop wrote in his PhD dissertation. This point is still controversial,” Traoré, who specialises in African literature, said, referring to the renowned Senegalese historian and African scholar.

Diop had in some of his works referred to man’s earliest origins “in the land the Egyptians called Afru-ika”, but the Egyptian link is one of the more robustly debated ones. (Note: For a sneak preview of the sometimes no-holds-barred dispute over the word, see here.)

‘May have been concocted’

“Even if [Africa] was an adoption from the Egyptians, to refer to birthplace… it may have been concocted, it may not have originally meant to refer to the entire region,”  Dr Peter Wekesa of Kenyatta University’s department of history, archeology and political studies told Africa Check.

Wekesa said he had looked at the works of authors such as Diop, African history author Robert July, respected Congolese intellectual Valentin-Yves Mudimbe and Berber historian Ibn Khaldun who have all extensively studied African culture and history, but the origin of the name “Africa” stays fuzzy.

“In most of [the theories], you get the impression that Africa as a term actually came to us from the outside world,” the scholar said, adding that more research is needed to answer a question that even stumps historians. (Note: Some lesser-mentioned theories can be found here.)

Are there African sources of the name?

Prof Rokhaya Fall, who heads the history department at Cheikh Anta Diop University, also alluded to Ifriquia, and to a related strand that “Africa” comes from an Arab word meaning “the untied land”  because the continent looks like a block that parted from Europe and Asia.

“But all these explanations do not say how African people called themselves. So we look for the origin of the word from the names given by [foreigners],” Fall, who specialises in the history of African societies, said.

“Are there within Africa sources confirming that those who lived in the continent gave that name to their own continent? This a field for research.”

To further leave us in knots, Traoré opened yet another door for the origin of the name, pointing to author Leon the African (Leo Africanus) who lived around the turn of the 16th century.

“According to Africanus, the name Africa was given to the continent by Malek-Afriki, king of the Sabéen Arabs, when he conquered the northern part of Africa in the sixth century.”

Important that Africans research own history

Our heads spinning, we readily agreed with the conclusion of Dr Godwin Murunga, executive secretary of pan-African think tank Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa. “The origin of ‘Africa’ remains in dispute,” Murunga told Africa Check.

The slave trade and colonisation had further muddied the waters of African identity, Traoré said. To turn a new page, it is important that Africans researched their own history and nurtured a sense of ownership.

“This is a very important step on the way to actual self-determination. So is it necessary to change the name of our continent?” she posed.

Additional reporting by Alphonce Shiundu

© Copyright Africa Check 2020. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Comment on this report

Comments 9
  1. By Chafi BAKARI

    I totally agree that in order to claim ownership of the name and our continent, we should research our own history. However, based on all we know and properly highlighted in your analysis, the name Africa has been given by foreigners, just like most African countries’ names and the size of each country drawn with disregard to the culture and social fabric in place. Given that this scramble of Africa since the 1885 Berlin Conference still hunt us in terms of mal-governance , particularly endemic corruption, I think that we should definitely change the name of the continent to reflect who we are, because researching on the history of the name will be time consuming. I would even go further to suggest that the continent should be redesigned to take into consideration ethnic groups. This would have a couple advantages some of them being (1) the valorisation of the languages and the culture through teaching them in schools and universities to avoid losing them, (2) development programs and projects be designed and implemented while respecting the culture. For instance, Yoruba land could be from Ile Ife in Nigeria to southern part of Nigeria and southern East part of Benin Republic, same thing could be done for other ethnic groups such as Hausa, Fulani, Madingo, Akan, Bamileke, Bantu etc etc etc. In conclusion changing the name of the continent should be the way to go.

    Reply Report comment
  2. By Azancoth Ventura

    We just have to start YAH is on our side! Awake 12 Tribes, this is our Homeland. Let’s start giving a name, our name for what is ours!

    Reply Report comment
  3. By Anelisa Matola

    I think as Africans the native people of the continent should rename the continent Africa to a name that resembles our ethnicity and authenticity. Retaining the name of our colonisers would most certainly prove that the native people of the continent are much dependent on the colonisers.

    Reply Report comment
  4. By Ntuweleni Lucas N Phalanndwa Sikhomo

    The name of the continent is CONGOLAND.Most of the people who are by descent Mesopotamians don’t like to use that name .They prefer name that will seem to prove that the continent was without people.Now why did Herod and Carthage decided to settle in a desert intead of accupying fertile land ?Most writers were biased .The black indigenous people were present in CONGOLAND, from the Mediterranean to Antarctica.They can not recognize most of your writing because your are still depending of sources from Europe.And people who must approve your writings are Europeans.Their aim is to rob you the land.

    Reply Report comment
  5. By Odia

    There’s no c in many African languages (if not all) so I totally refuse that name. Kongo is such a small empirical region of Africa and despite the richness of the Congo Basin (where I am native to) I prefer the name KAM. Just as the Aethiopian Sea turned Atlantic Ocean should be renamed KAM Sea.

    Reply Report comment
  6. By Odia

    P.S. white people names the region Niger-Congo without our consent based on their own ignorant ways of labeling things. Many are opposed to being called other tribe’s names. To avoid conflicts and a sense of superiority tribalism that could arise from this… because that much is often inevitable with our people, if you name regions after their first ancestors they will all be more open and accepting than if the name Congo were chosen. (Again, no “c” except in southern languages to emphasize clicking syllables).

    Reply Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.