Back to Africa Check

No, chimps aren’t our ancestors. Wrongheaded old illustration still being used against accepted theory of evolution

It’s a famous image. Six naked males walk from left to right, the first on his knuckles, the last upright. It’s based on a confused idea of evolution. And it’s often wrongly used in arguments against evolution.

The first figure looks like a chimpanzee. The next four walk on two feet, with gradually improving posture. At the front is a bearded man.

“If The Theory Of Evolution Were True.” That’s the header of a graphic using a version of the image. The graphic has been circulating online for at least a decade. It can be seen on Facebook here, here, here and here.

A red arrow points at the first, chimp-like figure and is labelled: “There are millions of these.” Another arrow points at the final figure: “And millions of these.”

Text below a bracket indicating the four central figures asks: “So where are the millions of these? (The Between Species).”

The graphic suggests that the theory of evolution says people evolved from chimpanzees, and that while chimps exist today, the missing links between them and us no longer exist.

But no evolutionary biologist believes that. And the graphic misleads in other ways.


Evolution is survival, not progress

Modern evolutionary theory was launched with the 1859 publication of English naturalist Charles Darwin’s book On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection.

The idea of evolution – that species change over time – had been around for a while. What wasn’t understood was how it worked.

Darwin’s theory is that evolution is driven by natural selection. Small, slow and steady beneficial changes to organisms, changes they’re born with, help them survive in their immediate environment.

The theory’s famous takeaway is “survival of the fittest”. But here “fittest” means a species being able to produce lots of babies, and those babies surviving to make more babies.

Through an almost unimaginable number of generations, over hundreds of thousands and millions of years, organisms with beneficial mutations tend to produce more surviving offspring. These offspring inherit the benefits and have more surviving offspring, and so on.

Creatures without good mutations, or with damaging mutations, tend to die before they can produce many offspring. The young they do have face the same survival challenges.

That’s the basic idea, although evolution has since been found to be a bit more complicated.

Nonetheless, evolution by natural selection is accepted as the way adaptation allows species to survive in their immediate environment.

Sometimes, survival depends on the body type of a species becoming more complex. But in other environments, species can evolve to be less complex.

Illustration from 60-year-old popular science book

The image in the graphic is a copy of an illustration published nearly 60 years ago in Early Man, a popular science Time-Life book from 1965. The illustration was titled “On the Road to Homo Sapiens”. It quickly became famous, and known as The March of Progress.

Homo sapiens – Latin for “wise man” – is the scientific name of the human species.

The title of Early Man – omitting children and women – indicates how out of date the book is. And the illustration’s two names indicate its misinterpretation of Darwin’s theory. Evolution isn’t a progressive march or a road to any destination.

March of Progress

The illustration appeared in a lavish fold-out in the book. When folded, it showed the iconic six figures. Unfolded, it showed nine more, for a total of 15. The larger illustration started with a gibbon-like primate, but still ended with the upright man.

March of Progress

The first figure in the shorter version is identified as Dryopithecus, an ancient genus of ape – not a modern chimpanzee. And the illustration’s rendering of Dryopithecus is based only on fragments of fossils of creatures that died a full 23 million to 2.6 million years ago.

There’s no evidence that Dryopithecus was our great-times-many grandparent. It was simply an ape, like us, but lived a long time ago. There’s currently no way of determining the genus’s relationship to us.

And while chimps are now our closest relatives, we didn’t descend from them. Instead, we have a common ancestor that lived an estimated 13 million years ago. Since then, we’ve changed a lot – and so have chimps.

Cousins – maybe – but not ancestors

We’re part of an ancient group of human species, but the only one around today. Past human species, identified from good fossil evidence, include Homo neanderthalenis (Neanderthal man), Homo habilis (handy man ) and Homo erectus (upright man).

It’s worth noting that Homo erectus probably roamed much of the planet for more than 1.8 million years, with the earliest fossil dated at 1.89 million years ago and the most recent at just 110,000 years ago – when we were also around. Fossils identified as us, Homo sapiens, have been dated to as far back as some 300,000 years ago.

Over those 300,000 years, fossil evidence suggests, several other species of human existed. They were, possibly, our cousins – but not our ancestors.

Misrepresentation of Darwin’s theory has taken lives

The incorrect belief that human evolution is a progressive march to an ideal has led to much suffering: genocidal notions of racial purity, the harmful eugenics movement, and apartheid in South Africa.

Darwin didn’t have this belief. The only illustration in his 1859 book was a diagram of species ancestry that looked like a branching tree – not a road or any “march of progress”.

Finally, a word on “theory”. In science, theories are accepted ideas. They include the big bang theory, the theory of gravity, the theory that Earth is round – and the theory of evolution by natural selection.

Proven dating of fossils shows that members of the human family have existed for millions of years. We’re just the one surviving branch. And chimps are our distant relatives, not our ancestors.

Republish our content for free

We believe that everyone needs the facts.

You can republish the text of this article free of charge, both online and in print. However, we ask that you pay attention to these simple guidelines. In a nutshell:

1. Do not include images, as in most cases we do not own the copyright.

2. Please do not edit the article.

3. Make sure you credit "Africa Check" in the byline and don't forget to mention that the article was originally published on

For publishers: what to do if your post is rated false

A fact-checker has rated your Facebook or Instagram post as “false”, “altered”, “partly false” or “missing context”. This could have serious consequences. What do you do?

Click on our guide for the steps you should follow.

Publishers guide

Africa Check teams up with Facebook

Africa Check is a partner in Meta's third-party fact-checking programme to help stop the spread of false information on social media.

The content we rate as “false” will be downgraded on Facebook and Instagram. This means fewer people will see it.

You can also help identify false information on Facebook. This guide explains how.

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
limit: 600 characters

Want to keep reading our fact-checks?

We will never charge you for verified, reliable information. Help us keep it that way by supporting our work.

Become a newsletter subscriber

Support independent fact-checking in Africa.