Back to Africa Check

No, Human Rights Watch didn’t release this statement on violence in Kenya’s Laikipia county

“Human Rights Watch statement on the killings in Laikipia, Kenya,” begins a document posted on Facebook.

It carries the logo of the global human rights organisation and criticises the Kenyan government for failing to quell the violence that has long plagued Laikipia county, at the foot of Mount Kenya. It is dated 7 September 2021, when the news of the most recent wave of violence broke. 

“The Human Rights Watch (HRW) has keenly been following the unfortunate events in Kenya that have led to the killing of scores of people in Laikipia county,” the document reads

“We are writing to convey our displeasure with the manner in which the Kenyan government has been handling the killings that target one ethnic group. By its inaction, the Government of Kenya has demonstrated a total neglect of rights of the victims.”

It adds: “Our initial investigations have revealed that the banditry attacks are politically-instigated, and are perpetuated by armed members of the Pokot community, targeting members of the Kikuyu community who live in the affected area. The attacks against members of a specific community are akin to ethnic cleansing and must be condemned in the strongest possible terms.”

The document then warns that the situation could escalate into electoral violence, as Kenya’s 2022 general elections near. It says Human Rights Watch will “keep an eye on the developments around this issue and announce its next move, depending on how the Kenyan government will handle the matter”.

But is this really a statement by Human Rights Watch? We checked.


‘Not our statement’

Africa Check emailed Otsieno Namwaya, Human Rights Watch director in East Africa, to ask about the document.

“The above is not our statement,” he replied. “Even though they have appropriated our logo, the style of the statement is not anywhere close to our kind of statement. 

“It’s also not clear who at HRW is issuing the statement. Or who the contacts for further follow up are. We have not been to Laikipia to be able to issue any statement. Please ignore this statement."

Republish our content for free

We believe that everyone needs the facts.

You can republish the text of this article free of charge, both online and in print. However, we ask that you pay attention to these simple guidelines. In a nutshell:

1. Do not include images, as in most cases we do not own the copyright.

2. Please do not edit the article.

3. Make sure you credit "Africa Check" in the byline and don't forget to mention that the article was originally published on

For publishers: what to do if your post is rated false

A fact-checker has rated your Facebook or Instagram post as “false”, “altered”, “partly false” or “missing context”. This could have serious consequences. What do you do?

Click on our guide for the steps you should follow.

Publishers guide

Africa Check teams up with Facebook

Africa Check is a partner in Meta's third-party fact-checking programme to help stop the spread of false information on social media.

The content we rate as “false” will be downgraded on Facebook and Instagram. This means fewer people will see it.

You can also help identify false information on Facebook. This guide explains how.

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
limit: 600 characters

Want to keep reading our fact-checks?

We will never charge you for verified, reliable information. Help us keep it that way by supporting our work.

Become a newsletter subscriber

Support independent fact-checking in Africa.