Back to Africa Check

No, Kenyan supreme court judge Njoki Ndung’u didn’t tweet that chief justice was ‘compromised’

IN SHORT: Kenya’s supreme court has emphasised that their ruling on a challenge to the 9 August 2022 presidential vote was unanimous among the seven judges. Justice Njoki Ndung’u hasn’t disowned this on Twitter.

A screenshot of what seems to be a tweet by Kenyan supreme court judge Njoki Ndung’u has been posted on Facebook.

The tweet makes a serious claim – that the head of the court, chief justice Martha Koome was “compromised” during a petition challenging the outcome of the recent presidential election. 

Kenyans voted in general elections on 9 August 2022. The country’s electoral body six days later declared United Democratic Alliance candidate William Ruto the winner of the presidential vote. This was challenged in court by Raila Odinga, the candidate for the Azimio la Umoja coalition, who came a close second. 

On 5 September, the supreme court upheld Ruto’s victory. It released detailed reasons for the decision on 26 September. The full judgement can be read here.

The tweet circulating on social media, supposedly from justice Ndung’u and dated 26 September, reads: “Truth be said, 5/7 were for the Re-run, but the @CJMarthaKoome was compromised. What is the detailed judgment for? Please IGNORE.”

It casts aspersions on Koome’s integrity, suggesting that a majority of the judges had called for a re-run of the presidential vote but were overruled by their boss.

In both the verdict and final judgement, the seven-judge supreme court stressed the decision was unanimous. 

The screenshot has also been posted here, here and here. But did justice Ndung’u really tweet it?

Ndungu_Fake

Digitally manipulated screenshot

News of a split among the seven judges of the supreme court would be reported by the mainstream Kenyan media. However, we found no record of this. In 2017, when the court annulled the presidential vote, reporting highlighted a 4-2 decision.

An advanced Twitter search for the tweet also showed no results and we could not find the tweet on justice Ndung’u’s Twitter account.

The judge’s Twitter account is not verified. But the screenshot doing the rounds is of a Twitter account with the blue tick verification badge.

Also missing from the tweet in the screenshot is the full stop that normally appears on Twitter after the time stamp.

Through its official verified Twitter account Kenya’s judiciary posted the screenshot and stamped it “FAKE NEWS”. Judge Ndung’u retweeted this on 27 September.

For publishers: what to do if your post is rated false

A fact-checker has rated your Facebook or Instagram post as “false”, “altered”, “partly false” or “missing context”. This could have serious consequences. What do you do?

Click on our guide for the steps you should follow.

Publishers guide

Africa Check teams up with Facebook

Africa Check is a partner in Meta's third-party fact-checking programme to help stop the spread of false information on social media.

The content we rate as “false” will be downgraded on Facebook and Instagram. This means fewer people will see it.

You can also help identify false information on Facebook. This guide explains how.

Further Reading

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
limit: 600 characters

Want to keep reading our fact-checks?

We will never charge you for verified, reliable information. Help us keep it that way by supporting our work.

Become a newsletter subscriber

Support independent fact-checking in Africa.