A meme widely shared on Facebook cautions people against sleeping with their cellphones under the pillow.
According to the meme, titled “Don’t ever sleep with mobile under the pillow”, most mobile phones emit harmful radiation due to transmission of signal of around 900 megahertz (MHz), and this radiation may damage your brain and cause headaches and muscle pain.
Are these claims correct?
Over 5 billion people using mobile phones
Mobile technology has spread rapidly around the globe. According to a 2018 Global System for Mobile Communications Association report, over 5 billion people in the world were connected to mobile services in 2017.
The report suggests that the number of unique mobile subscribers will reach 5.9 billion by 2025, equivalent to 71% of the world’s population. And as the use of mobile phones grows, so do the reports of its alleged risk on human health.
Understanding radio frequency radiation
The most common sources of radiofrequency radiation are wireless telecommunication devices and equipment, including cell phones, smart meters, and portable wireless devices, such as tablets and laptop computers.
The use of mobile phones and its potential to cause health problems has long been debated. This is because cell phones emit radiofrequency radiation from their antennas.
Study on cell phone radio frequency radiation
Several studies have been conducted because of concerns about the health effects from long-term exposure.
The findings focused on exposure to RFR from 2G and 3G cell phones which operate within a range of frequencies from about 700 to 2700 MHz.
There was clear evidence of tumors in the hearts of male rats and some evidence of tumors in the brain and adrenal glands of male rats.
So does RFR in cell phones cause harm?
Africa Check contacted the US Department of Health and Human Services to seek a clear understanding of the findings.
Christine Bruske Flowers, director in the office of communications and public liaison, told Africa Check that RFR exposures used in the studies cannot be compared directly to the exposure that humans experience when using a cell phone.
“In our studies, rats and mice received RFR across their whole bodies. By contrast, people are mostly exposed in specific local tissues close to where they hold the phone,” she said, quoting John Bucher, a senior scientist involved in the study.
“Our studies would support the statement that radiation may damage the brain, although we did not examine headaches or muscle pain,” Bucher told Africa Check.
‘No adverse health effects have been established’
According to World Health Organization, radiofrequency waves are electromagnetic fields, and unlike ionizing radiation such as X-rays or gamma rays, can neither break chemical bonds nor cause ionization in the human body.
But WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic (cancer causing) to humans, a category used when there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and less than sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals.
According to the IARC document, this category may also be used when the evidence of carcinogenicity in humans does not permit a conclusion to be drawn (referred to as “inadequate” evidence) but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals.
In an article published in 2014, the WHO said that a large number of studies have been performed over the last two decades to assess whether mobile phones pose a potential health risk.
“To date, no adverse health effects have been established as being caused by mobile phone use,” says the report.
Does radiation cause brain damage, headaches, muscle pain?
“A number of studies have investigated the effects of radiofrequency fields on brain electrical activity, cognitive function, sleep, heart rate and blood pressure in volunteers. To date, research does not suggest any consistent evidence of adverse health effects from exposure to radiofrequency fields at levels below those that cause tissue heating.
“Further, research has not been able to provide support for a causal relationship between exposure to electromagnetic fields and self-reported symptoms, or “electromagnetic hypersensitivity,” the WHO says.
The WHO says that with the recent popularity of mobile phone use among younger people, and therefore a potentially longer lifetime of exposure, it is doing more research on this age group.
“Several studies investigating potential health effects in children and adolescents are underway,” it says.
Conservative recommendations by US Food and Drug Administration
Despite insufficient evidence linking cellphone use to adverse health effects, the US Food and Drug Administration has issued recommendations for those concerned about radiofrequency energy.
“If there is a risk from being exposed to radiofrequency energy from cellphones and at this point we do not know that there is, it is probably very small,” part of the recommendation reads.
“But if you are concerned about avoiding even potential risks, you can take a few simple steps to minimize your radiofrequency exposure. Reduce the amount of time spent using your cell phone and use speaker mode or a headset to place more distance between your head and the cellphone,” it says. – Dancan Bwire
Africa Check teams up with Facebook
Africa Check has partnered with Facebook to combat fake news and false information on the social platform. This fact-check is part of the initiative.
As part of its third-party fact-checking programme, Facebook allows its partners to see public articles, pictures or videos that have been flagged as potentially inaccurate.
Content rated as “false” by fact-checkers will be downgraded in news feeds. This means fewer people will see it.
You can help us identify fake news and false information on Facebook. This guide explains how.
© Copyright Africa Check 2019. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.