Are more than a quarter of Nigerian women still subjected to genital mutilation?


More than a quarter of Nigerian women are still subjected to genital mutilation

Nigeria's The Guardian newspaper
(Jan 2018)



Explainer: Newest data shows this number has since fallen.

  • This statistic of  27% was correct as at 2011
  • But latest data shows it fell to 18.4% in 2016/7
  • If issue is to be tackled effectively, accurate information is key

The harmful traditional practice of female genital mutilation is still an accepted part of many Nigerian cultures.

Reporting on the threat to Nigerian girls’ survival and their development, a reporter in the country’s Guardian newspaper last month claimed that national statistics show “27% of Nigerian women between 15 and 49 are victims of female genital mutilation or cutting”.

Is the statistic accurate?

Violation of the rights of girls & women

Female genital mutilation includes all procedures or practices involving the removal of the external female genitalia or injury to it for non-medical purposes, the World Health Organisation explains.

The mutilations are mostly done by traditional circumcisers and local birth attendants. The United Nations terms the practice a violation of the rights of girls and women and to eradicate it is one of the organisation’s sustainable development goals.

Since May 2015, female genital mutilation is illegal in Nigeria after former president Goodluck Jonathan signed into law the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act. It stipulates a jail term of up to four years or a N200,000 (US$550) fine for offenders.

‘Statistic from trusted source’

The author of the newspaper report told Africa Check he got the data from a contact.

“I contacted one of my trusted sources for statistics on female genital mutilation; he then informed me about the claim,” Oluwaseun Akingboye said. He didn’t state which document or report was cited by his contact, however.

Without a specific source, Africa Check turned to the country’s statistics agency, the National Bureau of Statistics. The 2016/17 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey contains the most recent data on female genital mutilation, according to the data agency’s statistical information officer, Leo Sanni.

Done as part of its global indicator surveys, the United Nations Children’s Fund (Unicef) partners with local health and statistics agencies to carry out the nationally representative survey, which is usually done every five years.

During the latest round, 34,376 women between 15 and 49 were interviewed across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones and asked whether they had gone through some form of genital mutilation or cutting.  

The survey found that 18.4% of the women had been subjected to female genital mutilation. This is a drop from the previous round in 2011, when 27% of women aged 15-49 reported having experienced a form of mutilation or cutting. In 2007, the prevalence was estimated at 26%.

More girls still being cut

Despite the drop, the data showed that more girls below 14 are still being cut. Successive multi-indicator surveys indicate the share of girls in this group who underwent the custom almost doubled in the past 10 years. While it stood at 13% in 2007, by 2016/17 it had increased to 25.3%.

The survey has also revealed new regional hotspots for the practice, Atul Kumar, a Unicef spokesman, told Africa Check.  While states such as  Zamfara, Kaduna and Jigawa had a prevalence of under 20% during the 2011 survey, this rose significantly in the latest round. The share in Zamfara increased from 2.5% to 26.4%, in Kaduna from 19% to 39.3% and from 2% to 14.4% in Jigawa.

Kumar noted that “more worringly”, prevalence also rose in girls below 14 in these states. Zamfara recorded an increase from 5% to 58.2%, Kaduna from 38.3% to 63.1%, Jigawa from 36.9% to 66.9%. In Kano state, it went from 51.4% to 71%.

(Note: Kumar has not yet elaborated on possible reasons for the increase in this age group. We will update this report with his response.)

Rise could be due to increased reporting

A public health expert, Dr Sunday Aderibigbe, said the rise could be due to increased reporting as more mothers become aware of the dangers of female genital mutilation. Aderibigbe teaches public health and community medicine at the University of Ilorin.

“A good number of them are coming out to say their child has undergone the practice,” he said.

Still, 21.6% of the sampled mothers approved of the practice. This could be due to traditional myths around it and the perception that it is cultural, an anti-FGM campaigner, Jolaoluwa Aina, told Africa Check.

“I remember meeting a practitioner who told me the practice was handed down to him from his grandfather. Many of them feel they have to continue the act as a way to protect their culture,” said Aina, who is a member of the EndCuttingGirls initiative.

“We also need to look in the direction of traditional and religious leaders. We need their support to help checkmate this activity. They have a strong hold on their people.”

Conclusion: Female genital mutilation still prevalent in Nigeria, though data shows a reduction in 15-49 age group

To draw attention to the serious issue of female genital mutilation in Nigeria, a newspaper reported that 27% of Nigerian women between 15 and 49 have been subjected to it.

While that was the estimate in 2011, the latest data from a Unicef survey shows that it has fallen to 18.4% in 2016/7. In contrast to this, the number of girls younger than 14 that their mothers reported as being cut has almost doubled since 2007. Some states also reported a big jump.

Whether this is due to increased reporting or other factors, Unicef couldn’t say. But these variances need to be teased out if campaigners want to make headway.


Further reading:

© Copyright Africa Check 2020. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.