Subscribe to reports

Has South Africa lost R700 billion to corruption since ’94?

Comments 2

It’s been stated as fact that South Africa has lost R700 billion in public money to corruption since the advent of democracy in 1994. But how does one measure the cost of hidden crime?

Researched by Sintha Chiumia & Anim van Wyk

With “Corruption Fact #1” – that South Africa has lost R700 billion to corruption over the last 20 years – trade unions and civil society organisations have been rallying citizens to join marches against corruption today.

One of the Unite Against Corruption march organisers and former general secretary of trade union Cosatu, Zwelinzima Vavi, used the R700 billion figure widely. To talk radio show host Tim Modise, Vavi said: “R700 billion could have been used to address the principal challenge of South Africa.”

Vavi also reportedly cited the number to urge Nissan assembly plant workers and a gathering of National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa members to join the march.

When he tweeted the R700 billion figure, a Twitter user replied: “No ways. Lucky guess?”

Is it a guess or the result of thorough research? Africa Check got out the calculators.

‘A percentage of the GDP’

corruptionfact1On social media, Unite Against Corruption attributed the claim to the Institute of Internal Auditors. This likely refers to the January launch of the Anti-Intimidation and Ethical Practices Forum, an association of different organisations fighting corruption

At the event, the forum’s chair and head of the Institute of Internal Auditors South Africa, Claudelle von Eck, reportedly said: “The cost of corruption in the last 20 years… we have lost R700-billion.”

Von Eck confirmed to Africa Check she had made the claim but said she was quoting the Institute for Accountability in Southern Africa. The institute’s head, Paul Hoffman, was quoted using the R700 billion figure last year. (Updated from R675 billion he cited the year before and in 2012.)

But Hoffman passed the buck to Tendersure, a web-based tendering tool, owned by a company called Sentigol. “[Tendersure] worked that out as a percentage of the GDP… 20% of the GDP over the last 20 years works out to that,” Hoffman told Africa Check.

An October 2011 article in Engineering News quoted the head of Sentigol, Werner Coetzee, as saying research by international anti-corruption bodies showed Africa to lose “about 25%” of its gross domestic product (GDP) to corruption.

Coetzee then explained that 25% of South Africa’s GDP of R2,700 billion (likely 2010’s) came to R675-billion and that this figure was potentially lost to corruption.

But he told Africa Check he was misquoted: “I don’t know how anyone would arrive at that number.” The businessman said he once attempted to calculate the cost of corruption in the past 20 years, but gave up because it would “ignore the corruption during apartheid”.

Formula from Transparency International

tiCoetzee didn’t pluck the corruption formula out of thin air, but he got the wrong end of the stick.

Global civil society organisation Transparency International published a handbook called Curbing Corruption in Public Procurement in 2006. The very first paragraph states “damages from corruption” is usually estimated at “between 10% and 25%, and in some cases as high as 40 to 50%” of a country’s public procurement contracts – not its GDP.

Yet the bibliography does not contain any reference to studies showing how this share was arrived at. Africa Check contacted the organisation’s public sector integrity programme head, José María Marín, who said he’d look into it, but we haven’t yet received a response. (Note: He responded after this report was published and his comment is included at the bottom of the report.)

Since then the statement has become a tumbleweed claim: rolling along year after year, from one report to another, without source or context, supposedly holding true wherever it goes.

From R30 billion a year to R675 billion since ’94

So how did we end up with “R700 billion lost to corruption in South Africa in the last 20 years”? Here is Africa Check’s theory, give or take R5 billion:

1. The formula from Transparency International, or the various other organisations that quoted its information, made its way to South African treasury official Sonwabo Tshoko who stated in a 2010 presentation: “It has been estimated that R30 billion per year, which is 20% of the overall government procurement budget of R150 billion, is being lost or is disappearing into a black hole of fraud and corruption.”

(Tshoko has since left and Africa Check could not get hold of him or more information on the calculation via Treasury spokesman Phumza Macanda.)

2. South Africa’s then head of the Special Investigating Unit, Willie Hofmeyr, used this information when asked to estimate the cost of corruption in parliament in October 2011. According to the minutes, “Hofmeyr responded that it was difficult to do so, but one suggestion by National Treasury was that it might amount to about 20% of the annual procurement budget, or about R25 billion a year”.

(Hofmeyr confirmed to Africa Check he got the information from Treasury, but couldn’t remember the exact source.)

3. The head of the Institute for Accountability, Paul Hoffman, attributed the figure of R30 billion per year to Hofmeyr in a 2012 conference report. However, it seems that when the time came to present the report, he used R675 billion as a total figure lost to corruption since 1994. A news report said: “Hoffman based the figure of R675 billion on government’s admission that the economy loses R30 billion per year to corrupt activities. The disclosure elicited visible shock among conference goers.”

(A quick calculation shows that R30 billion times 18 years is R540 billion, not considering inflation.)

So how much has SA really lost to corruption?

A marcher at Cape Town's Unite Against Corruption March hold a banner which claims R700 billion has been lost to corruption in 20 years. Photo: @ONEBLOODSAThe frustrating – and logical – answer is we just can’t say for sure.

Macanda said South Africa’s Treasury does not attempt to calculate the cost of corruption. “Our observation is that people speculate and also tend to use the word corruption when what they are talking about is irregular, unauthorised or wasteful expenditure,” she said.

Africa Check spoke to Hennie van Vuuren, research associate at the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) and writer of a 2005 Transparency International country study report on South Africa.

He said the idea that corruption costs 20% (or 10% or 25%) of public procurement comes from the assumption that middlemen involved in corruption demand 8 to 10% of a contract’s value. “But this differs from transaction to transaction and industry to industry,” he said.

Ways to gauge trends in corruption include perception surveys and tallying detected cases. Van Vuuren said one could even include illicit outflows – where private companies move money to tax havens abroad – in the broader ambit of corruption, which was estimated to be in the region of R300 billion in 2012 alone.

“Our constant need to define corruption in monetary terms ignores the much more fundamental costs of corruption – carried by individuals in weakened forms of government,” he said.

The head of governance, crime and justice division at the Institute for Security Studies, Gareth Newham, told Africa Check “we simply don’t know what the actual amount is because corruption is a crime in which both parties benefit and will seek to hide”.

However, Newham said he thinks a “considerable” amount has been lost to corruption “given the large scale of the problem and the high level involvement of our political elite in corruption”.

It’s “impossible to know” how much money South Africa has lost to corruption, the executive director of non-profit organisation Corruption Watch, David Lewis, told Africa Check.

“Various people, various institutions have come up with estimates. I don’t know how they arrive at these figures,” he said. “I am comfortable to say there is a high level of corruption in SA but you can’t rely on those estimates.”

Conclusion: Figure of R700 billion a thumbsuck

At today’s anti-corruption march there will surely be many placards saying “South Africa lost R700 billion to corruption since 1994”. Although a firm figure helps spur citizens to action – in a country where experts agree that it’s a big problem – this specific estimate is not reliable.

The amount probably stems from a claim that about 20% of a country’s public procurement budgets disappears into backpockets, attributable to Transparency International as far as we could tell, but not backed up by research studies. Since then it’s been mangled beyond recognition in South Africa.

 

Additional reading

COMMENT: No accurate statistics for corruption in SA

The head of Transparency International's public sector integrity programme, José Marín, provided comment after this report was published. He said: "I have checked with the author of the [Curbing Corruption in Public Procurement handbook] and she stated that the figures were her own calculations initially based on the World Bank doing figures whereby the average bribe was 12% of the contracts, that was taken from the estimated annual value of contracts worldwide. I was unable to track the exact figures since the calculations were made in 2006."

He referred Africa Check to the World Bank's Enterprise Survey, saying that the survey has "an indicator on the share of the value of a government contract value that is expected to be paid as a gift". For South Africa, the share listed is 1.7%, as reported by firms surveyed in 2007.

© Copyright Africa Check 2015. You may reproduce this report or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events, subject to providing a credit to "Africa Check a non-partisan organisation which promotes accuracy in public debate and the media. Twitter @AfricaCheck and www.africacheck.org".

Comment on this report

Comments 2
  1. By Marko Vogler

    If this is not the accurate figure as proposed by Africa Check, then Africa Check must provide evidence to the contrary, that can be substantiated. They have a damn cheek to berate figures that others have provided without proving their figures. What makes them experts on corruption and the cost there of? When you read the thousands of comments on various sites and blogs, the R700 Billion is most likely an under-estimation. I would suggest that one does their homework first and accurately quote sources. What you have achieved with your article is shown “gutter” journalism. As one of the comments below state, it is not really the figures that matter, we all agree it is an enormous amount – figures that are too horrendous to imagine. I take my hat off and commend every single person who marched against corruption because they are standing up and saying enough is enough! Whether it be 1 Billion or 700 Billion. Our country and its people cannot afford what corruption costs its people. At the end of the day, no-one is exempt from the scourge of corruption and it affects every single one of us. What have you achieved Africa Check from your poorly written articles? You have certainly achieved far less than the people who were standing there in the rain and marching for what they believe.

    +1
    0
    vote
    • By mpiyakhe siphamandla dhlamini

      This article tried to verify the source for a claim(like most Africa check articles),they’re not arguing that corruption is not a problem only that it’s impossible to know how much it has cost us due to the nature of it(the sources of the claim don’t hold muster and thus the logical thing to do is discount the claim because there’s a flaw in how it was calculated).

      You can’t simply say I assume that middle men always demand (8-10)% of a contract’s value and using the proportion of the budget spent on procurement suddenly announce that corruption costs 675billion a year,for all we know the figure could be less or much more than that.

      +1
      0
      vote

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.

*