Is male chauvinism to blame for nearly 80% of road deaths in SA?

Comments 4

The “male stubborn and chauvinistic attitude” accounted for 78.4% of traffic deaths in the first 19 days of December 2016, South Africa’s minister of transport claimed. How did she determine that?

Sunshine and matric results are synonymous with South Africa’s festive season – as is the country’s road death toll, sadly.

Between the 1st and 19th of December, 845 people died on South African roads, transport minister Dipuo Peters announced in a briefing before Christmas.

This included 331 passengers (39% of the total), 290 pedestrians (34%), 201 drivers (24%) and 23 cyclists (3%).

Women and girls made up 21.1% of the death toll, with the sex of about 4 people (0.5%) yet to be identified pending DNA tests, an information manager with the Road Traffic Management Corporation, Rosina Moloto, told Africa Check.

But the minister took aim at men in particular. She told reporters that action needs to be taken “to deal with the male stubborn and chauvinistic attitude as they account for 78.4% of fatalities”.

Peters’ claim was picked up by a number of media houses, ranging from online news sites to radio and television. “’Stubborn and chauvinistic’ men to blame for most road deaths”, read a headline on TimesLIVE.

One of our readers suggested we take a closer look at the claim. Step one: finding out what Peters meant when she attributed deaths to the “male stubborn and chauvinistic attitude”.

‘An attitude of superiority towards females’

The minister’s spokesman, Ishmael Mnisi, told Africa Check in an email that Peters’ comments refer to “an attitude of superiority towards females. This is done by openly displaying their financial accumulations, masculinity using their vehicles capacity to move fast and the display of the car technical capacity.”

There is a link between gender and road traffic deaths, researcher Roger Behrens from the University of Cape Town’s Centre for Transport Studies, told Africa Check.

More men tend to die on South Africa’s roads than women and a possible causal link is differences in risk-taking behaviour.

The Centre for Transport Studies conducted a study of road crashes, deaths and injuries for the Western Cape provincial transport department in 2010. It showed that 37.3% of 711 traffic deaths in 2007 were of drivers. Only 8% of the drivers who died were women, though they were behind the wheel in 25% of the crashes.

Researcher Marianne Vanderschuren explained that this “is where we are certain about the difference in behaviour causing this”. In the report, Vanderschuren recommended that the department’s road safety education specifically focus on young men and young male drivers “as they are the main group responsible for road crashes, even if they themselves are not always the fatality”.

78.4% figure doesn’t reveal crash causes

That said, the 78.4% figure that Peters referred to did not only include male drivers – who may have caused the crash in which they died – but all male pedestrians, passengers and cyclists who died in the period. The RTMC’s Moloto confirmed this to Africa Check.

Furthermore, the figure doesn’t tell us what caused the fatal car crashes. Male chauvinism would count as a human factor, one of three categories to which crashes are attributed.

The bulk of male deaths in the first weeks of December fell into this human factor category, at 81.9%.

Contributing factor Share
Vehicle 8.1%
Road & environment 10%
Human 81.9%

However, human factors do not necessarily equal driver error. A breakdown of preliminary figures Moloto shared for the whole month showed that more than a quarter of men and boys who died due to human factors were jaywalking.

So even if we accepted the “chauvinistic attitude” as a causal factor of traffic deaths, it couldn’t account for the whole 78.4%. A much more careful analysis – based on accurate capturing – of the data is required.

To facilitate this, the Road Traffic Management Corporation can help by making datasets readily and frequently available.

Conclusion: The minister’s claim is misleading

South Africa’s minister of transport claimed that 78.4% of male deaths during the first 19 days of December 2016 could be accounted for by “the stubborn and chauvinistic male attitude”.

Data from the Road Traffic Management Corporation showed that the figure related to all the men and boys that died in crashes. This included cyclists and pedestrians (and excluded men who survived an accident they caused).

Further, while the men and boys overwhelmingly died due to human factors, contributing factors to do with vehicles (such as tyres that burst) or the environment (such as poor visibility) played a role in close to 20% of the deaths.

Experts confirmed a link between road deaths and gender, citing differences in risk-taking behaviour between men and women as a possible explanation. However, they told Africa Check that chauvinist attitudes speak more to perceptions that may be held by drivers than actual causes of crashes.

Solving a problem requires a thorough understanding of its causes. In few other social matters in South Africa is this more important than road safety.


Additional reading

© Copyright Africa Check 2020. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Comment on this report

Comments 4
  1. By Frank Wepener

    I believe that Traffic Police are indirectly responsible for most accidents. If they adopted prosecuting other traffic offences with the same zeal as they do speedsters, accidents will be reduced. Prosecute the following too: ignoring stop signs and traffic lights, passing across solid whine lines, passing into the face of oncoming traffic, stopping on the road, stopping in intersections, turning without signalling, driving at 40 km/h on open roads, using park lights instead of headlights, not using headlights in poor visibility, front and read lights not all in working condition, etc.
    Then there are the bicycles, riding four, five abreast on the open road, having vehicles causing obstruction by slowly following cyclist with their emergency lights flashing, making it more difficult to get past the obstruction.
    I would suggest that no person should be appointed as a traffic officer unless he scores at least 80% on a test on the NRA 93 of 1997, including the sections regarding bicycles and the practicing of sport on public roads.

    Reply Report comment
  2. By Stuart

    Also problematic is the assumption that 81.59 percentage of deaths are attributable to human factors. The current South African paradigm of road design assumes the average driver, and does not make many allowances for drivers to make mistakes. So if a mistake is made which results in an accident, it is assumed that the fault is the drivers and not that of the system. An alternative perception of human behaviour assumes drivers will at some point make serious mistakes whilst driving, and that road design should plan for and accommodate this. This is part of the founding assumptions of Vision Zero in Sweden, a road safety strategy that aims for 0 fatalities from road accidents. Given the unnacceptly high number of road accidents & fatalities in South Africa, maybe we should start more along the lines of Vision Zero.

    Reply Report comment
  3. By Andrew Wright

    Given the well known issues with policing, roadworthiness of huge numbers of vehicles etc etc, there is little that can be done, unless you are a politician & can save the world through insupportable public statements.

    The most outrageous number is that of those killed, 34% were pedestrians. Astounding – unless you know the environment, of course. Dark, unlit roads, no (or extremely few) sidewalks or pavements & on any Friday night or during any public holiday, a large number of pedestrians are extremely drunk & unaware of where they are in relation to vehicles on the road. Where else in the devloped world does one see signs on the highways warmning of pedestrians?? It is all so common that the majority of drivers on rural roads routinely drive in the middle of the road, in order to avoid pedestrians – that makes any kind of rural driving quite dangerous, in & of itself.

    Reply Report comment
  4. By Christian

    In northern Europe, most people tend to follow traffic rules more rigidly and expect the same of other drivers. In southern Europe, most people tend to follow traffic rules in a much less strict manner, but also expect the same of others and, as a consequence, watch out with much more care for other drivers. In Poland, there are much more accidents than in either northern or southern Europe, as the article says, because sadly most drivers tend to be pig-headed and to care about no one else on the road other than themselves. It is this unacceptable behaviour that can be described as anti-Polish, as it costs thousands of Poles their life or limb, rather than the paper that reports about it.

    Reply Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.