Does Nigeria have 23% of world’s malaria cases, as an insecticide maker claimed?

Claim

“Nigeria contributes 23% of the global malaria cases”

Source: Insecticide brand Mortein

downplayed

Verdict

Explainer: Most recent data shows its higher

  • Insecticide brand’s references were untraceable
  • Determining exact number of malaria cases in Nigeria almost impossible
  • Best estimate is that Nigeria contributed 27% of global cases in 2016


In recent years, major insecticide brand Mortein is highly visible in anti-malaria campaigns in Nigeria. It often partners with state governments and agencies.

As part of these campaigns, the brand from British consumers goods giant Reckitt Benckiser issued a malaria factsheet. It states “Nigeria contributes 23% of the global malaria cases.”

Does this claim line up with the latest estimates?

Faulty reference links

In its factsheet, Mortein provided three references for its claim. Two of the links – for the Malaria Atlas Project and the Better Health Channel funded by the state government of Victoria, Australia – returned errors.

Africa Check asked Reckitt Benckiser’s Nigeria office to clarify which sources they used, but they have not yet responded to the queries. (Note: This report will be updated when they do.)

The third source was a general malaria information webpage from the UK’s National Health Service (NHS). A section referenced the World Malaria Report 2014 by the World Health Organisation (WHO).

Covering the year 2013, this report stated that Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria together accounted for 34% of malaria cases and 39% of deaths in the world. However, it did not explicitly provide each country’s share.

The most recent WHO data on malaria – for 2016 – put Nigeria’s share of total malaria cases at 27%, with its share of deaths even higher – at 30%.

Health facilities record fraction of cases

Determining the exact number of malaria cases in Nigeria is almost impossible, said Dr Olukemi Amodu of the Institute of Child Health at the University of Ibadan’s medicine faculty.

Amodu, who is a member of the European Virtual Institute of Malaria Research, told Africa Check that the difficulty lies in inadequate reporting of the cases.

“Some people who suffer from malaria in Nigeria don’t go to the hospital. They basically self-medicate and take care of themselves. So whatever number is recorded by health facilities is usually a fraction of the real situation.”

For countries with poor surveillance systems and where routine data is considered unreliable, WHO estimates are the best bet for comparing countries’ contribution to the global malaria burden. This Dr Audu Mohammed, coordinator of Nigeria’s National Malaria Elimination Programme, told Africa Check.

“Statistical formulas and epidemiological modelling are employed to get near accurate data in countries like Nigeria,” Mohammed said.

“We collect data throughout the year; that is surveillance data we get from [public] health facilities. Sometimes we extrapolate. For instance, if you are getting data from a particular state for the first six to seven months and then they fall out and [health workers] go on strike, you [then] have to extrapolate.”

‘Best estimate that can be made’

The WHO uses a statistical model developed by the Malaria Atlas Project to arrive at estimates, Dr Tolu Arowolo, the national professional officer for malaria in the WHO’s Lagos office, told Africa Check.

The project’s programme manager Mike Thorn explained that they estimate the parasite rate – the share of people infected with the malaria parasite – and the number of cases for each 5 km by 5 km grid in a country.

“Each estimate is accompanied by a confidence interval, which indicates how confident we are the estimates are correct,” Thorn added. “We sum up estimates to give national totals, which is what we did for Nigeria.”

Thorn added that the figures of Nigeria contributing 27% of global cases need to be taken with confidence intervals in mind.

“The figures of the number of cases we’ve attributed to Nigeria are the best estimate that can be made, given the data available to feed into the statistical models.”

Surveillance system has improved

Arowolo, who is an epidemiologist, noted that Nigeria’s share of the global malaria burden has varied, but that she “cannot categorically say whether or not Nigeria’s share of global malaria cases has been 23%”.

Nigeria’s malaria surveillance system has improved in recent years and this has led to an increase in the number of reported cases, Arowolo said.

“A lot more centres are now contributing data. We are having high number of reported cases but it does not necessarily mean there are more cases of malaria. Our parasitemia level in the country shows that malaria is reducing. However, as more private health facilities begin to contribute malaria data, chances are that Nigeria’s reported malaria cases will remain high.”

Conclusion: Malaria factsheet understated Nigeria’s malaria burden

A major insecticide brand stated in a factsheet that Nigeria contributes 23% of global malaria cases.

Accurate data on the exact number of malaria cases in Nigeria each year is hard to come by as surveillance is poor. To plug this gap, the World Health Organisation relies on a statistical model developed by the Malaria Atlas Project.

Employed for all countries where malaria occurs, the most recent iteration put Nigeria’s share of global malaria cases at 27% in 2016, dropping from 29% in 2015.

This is the highest in the world by far.

 

Additional reading:

© Copyright Africa Check 2017. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.