Race, poverty and inequality: Black First Land First claims fact-checked

Comments 6

Former member of parliament, Andile Mngxitama, made several claims about race, poverty and inequality in South Africa in a recent article on behalf of the Black First Land First movement. Africa Check found three to be in the right ballpark, while two were incorrect.

Do 35,000 white families and businesses own more than 80% of South Africa’s land? Are more than 45% of black people unemployed compared with 5% of white people? Do white families earn six times more than black families? And do white people occupy 60% of top management positions in South Africa?

These claims were made by former Economic Freedom Fight member of parliament, Andile Mngxitama, in a recent opinion piece written on behalf of the Black First Land First movement.

Mngxitama has previously said that the movement aims “to decolonialise and deracialise” land ownership in South Africa, but spokesman, Lindsay Maasdorp, declined to comment on their objectives.

‘Pseudo research outfits for colonialism’

A vineyard of table grapes stand in the sun, on January 11, 2013 in De Doorns, a small farming town about 140Km North of Cape Town. Photo: AFP/Rodger Bosch DeDoorns
A vineyard of table grapes in De Doorns, a small farming town about 140 km North of Cape Town in January 2013. Photo: AFP/Rodger Bosch

When Mngxitama wrote last year that “about 40,000 white families own up to 80% of our land”, Africa Check found the statement was incorrect and not supported by any survey or data.

Mngxitama seems to have taken the figures from two separate datasets: a state land audit (carried out by the office of South Africa’s chief surveyor-general and published in 2013) and the 2007 census of commercial agriculture.

The state land audit found that 79% of South Africa’s landmass was in private hands, but it included all urban real estate as well as agricultural and mining land in South Africa, owned by both black and white South Africans, foreigners, companies and trusts.

The commercial agriculture census only recorded farming units registered for Value Added Tax (VAT), which would have excluded smaller and recreational farmers. Of the 39,966 farming units identified, 33,249 were owned by individuals, with 2,167 belonging to companies, 2,259 to close corporations and 874 described as “family-owned”. The census did not reflect the racial composition of the owners of farming units.

It may be that this time round Mngxitama added the number of individually owned farming units to the family-owned ones, a figure that comes to 34,123.

But when Africa Check emailed Mngxitama this week to request the sources for his claims, he did not respond. He replied to a tweet though, saying “we don’t respond to pseudo research outfits for colonialism. Go ahead and promote your racist ideology and interests.”

We then consulted the most recent economic and employment data to see whether it supported his claims.

Unemployment

Claim

“More than 45% of black people are unemployed compared with only 5% of white people.”

Verdict

mostly-correct

The latest employment statistics from Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) for April to June 2015 revealed that 27.9% of black African people were unemployed in comparison to 7% of white people, according to the narrow definition of unemployment.

Mngxitama’s figures are closer to South Africa’s broad unemployment rate, which includes discouraged job-seekers. These are people between 15 and 64 who want to work but are not actively searching for a job because they have lost hope, or want to work but are unable to find jobs in the area, or have been unable to find work that required their skills.

The Stats SA data showed that in the second quarter of this year 39% of black African people were unemployed, according to the broad definition, compared to 8.3% of white people.

Income

Claim

“White families earn six times more than what black families earn. A black family’s annual income is R60,000 whereas a white family earns an annual income of R360,000.”

Verdict

mostly-correct

Mngxitama’s figures resemble estimates from South Africa’s 2011 census, which found that the average annual income of black African households was R60,613 then. In comparison, white households’ average annual income was six times higher at R365,134.

However, service delivery statistics manager at Stats SA, Niël Roux, told Africa Check that the most recent and relevant data on household income was from their 2010/11 Income and Expenditure of Households Survey. Roux said the survey had been “fine-tuned to measure household income and expenditure”.

The survey, which gathered data between September 2010 and August 2011, estimated that black African households’ average (or mean) income was R69,632. White households’ average income was five and a half times higher at R387,011.

A senior researcher at the University of the Witwatersrand’s School of Economic and Business Sciences, Nicolas Pons-Vignon, told Africa Check that the median incomes of black African and white households provides further insight. The median income is the point where half the households earn more than it and half the households less.

“In a country as unequal as South Africa, high earners push the mean [average] above the median, for both populations though more for whites, unsurprisingly given that there are also many more poor black households,” said Pons-Vignon.

Black African households had a median income of R34,078 compared to their average of R69,632. This means that half of black African households have a household income of less than R34,078 per year.

Household size

Claim

“On average, a black family comprises six people compared with a white family of three people.”

Verdict

incorrect

Stats SA’s Roux told Africa Check that, according to the 2011 census, the average black African household included 3.9 people. In comparison, an average white household was comprised of 2.8 people.

The average coloured and Indian household were the largest, with 4.3 people and 4 people respectively.

Management

Claim

“Whites are only 10% of the economically active population but occupy more than 60% of the top management positions.”

Verdict

mostly-correct

The economically active population includes people aged from 15 to 64 who are either employed, or unemployed and seeking employment. This data comes from Stats SA’s quarterly labour force surveys.

Population Group Total
Black African 76.2%
Coloured 10.6%
White 10.3%
Indian 2.8%

Source: Commission for Employment Equity 2014/15 Annual Report & Quarterly Labour Force Survey, Quarter 3, 2014

The commission for employment equity compiles an annual report on employment equity for the department of labour. The data in the report is submitted once a year by “designated employers”, which include employers who employ 50 or more employees, employers who employ fewer than 50 employees but have a certain annual turnover, municipalities, all levels of government, state-owned companies and educational institutions.

Submissions from designated employers for 2014/15 only accounted for 7 million employees out of the 20.3 million people in South Africa’s economically active segment.

Of these employees, 70% of top management level positions were held by white people, with 13.6% held by black African people. Coloured and Indian people held 4.7% and 8.4% of top management level positions respectively.

Race Top management Senior management Professionally qualified Skilled technical
Black African 13.6% 20.5% 36.7% 58.5%
White 70% 59.3% 41.9% 22.7%
Indian 8.4% 9.9% 9.1% 5.8%
Coloured 4.7% 7.2% 9.5% 5.8%
Foreign nationals 3.4% 3.1% 2.7% 1.7%

Source: 2014/15 Commission for Employment Equity Report

 

Additional Reading:

Do 40,000 whites own 80% of SA? The claim is incorrect

FACTSHEET: Unemployment statistics in South Africa explained

FACTSHEET: What is poverty?

ANALYSIS: As SA debates a minimum wage – a primer on income inequality

© Copyright Africa Check 2017. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Comment on this report

Comments 6
  1. By Francois Conradie

    How’s the last claim about management incorrect? It’s perfectly correct according to the sources you cite. In fact you could expect that non-designated employers are probably less diverse than designated ones, so that the reality is worse than the 70% given by the commission.

    vote
    Reply Report comment
  2. By Naseera

    It is highly unfair that ordinary South African families cannnot afford to visit nature reserves like Cape Point or other managed by Cape Nature. I wonder if these lands are also privately owned and simply managed by CN or why else would it he so expensive? Rates at guest farms and privately owned nature reserves also ensure that the less fortunate are kept out. Once again who really owns these?

    vote
    Reply Report comment
  3. By Phale

    I think South Africans pay with their lives to keep this in-equality going for the more African get excluded the bigger the propensity to contact economic crimes by Africans and hence murders and homicides committed by the excluded Race

    +1
    0
    vote
    Reply Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.

*