Tax incentives cost Kenya 6% of GDP, but there’s no global ‘standard’

Claim

The standard for tax expenditures is about 2% of gross domestic product.

Source: Ukur Yatani, Kenya’s cabinet secretary for the treasury (June 2020)

incorrect

Verdict

Explainer: Experts said there was no “standard” or even average for tax expenditures.

  • The day before he delivered his 2020/21 budget, Kenya’s treasury cabinet secretary Ukur Yatani said tax breaks would be reduced because they cut government revenue.
  • He said “tax expenditures” – the cost of tax breaks – were about 6% of Kenya’s GDP, while the “standard” was just 2%.
  • Experts said there was no global standard for tax expenditures, and different tax systems in different countries meant even an average would not be a useful comparison.


Kenya’s government is looking to reduce tax breaks it has given to attract investment.

In recent years authorities have been inundated with requests for reduced taxation, cabinet secretary for the treasury Ukur Yatani said the day before he presented his 2020/21 budget. 

“We have people going to treasury and to parliament asking for tax exemptions, for zero rating of their products and for reduced taxation,” he said in a 10 June TV interview

An April cut in value-added tax and income tax had, for example, cost the treasury “about KSh172 billion”, he said. 

Rolling back tax concessions would not be popular with the business community, he added, but continuing with them would be too costly. 

Yatani said Kenya’s “tax expenditures” – what tax breaks cost the government – were among the highest in the world, at 6% of gross domestic product. “The standard expenditure is about 2% of GDP.”

But does such a standard exist? We checked.

Expenditures close to 6% in 2017

We contacted Yatani to ask for the source of his claim and will update this report with his response. He previously told Africa Check that certain tax relief measures had missed their target.

“Sometimes we give concessions in terms of tax exemptions and the benefits are not passed on to the intended beneficiaries,” he said in May 2020 when we found that the country has since 2010 missed its revenue targets.

According to the IMF, Kenya’s estimated tax expenditures were KSh478 billion in 2017. As a share of its KSh8.2 trillion GDP that year, these came to 5.9% – close to the minister’s figure. 

In 2017, the country’s tax agency missed its revenue target by KSh300 billion. 

What are tax expenditures?

Tax expenditures are “a government’s estimated revenue loss that results from giving tax concessions or preferences to a taxpayer or activity”. This is according to the International Budget Partnership, an organisation that focuses on the spending of public funds.

In a 2019 report on fiscal transparency in Kenya, the International Monetary Fund said tax expenditures were “provisions of tax law, regulations, or practices that reduce or postpone revenue for certain taxpayers relative to a benchmark tax”.

These include exemptions from taxation, reductions in the amount owed, reduced tax rates and delays in paying tax.

But there is little data on expenditures in Kenya, as it “does not publish any regular report that comprehensively discloses the estimated revenue losses from tax expenditures”, the IMF said.


The Kenya Revenue Authority reports on tax concessions to the office of the auditor general, but this is not published due to “concerns over the reliability of the data”.

In a January 2020 report, the Center for Global Development said it was “difficult to make a conclusive judgment about the considerations that go into providing tax incentives in Kenya” as they were not clearly recorded.

Is there a global ‘standard’ for tax expenditures?

We asked several experts if there was a standard or even average for tax expenditures.

Dr Sanjeev Gupta is a senior policy fellow at the Center for Global Development (CGD), a US-based think tank, who previously worked in public finance at the IMF.

He told Africa Check was no international standard for tax expenditures. “There is no such rule — the numbers are all over the place.” 

Dr Paolo De Renzio, a senior research fellow at the International Budget Partnership in Washington DC, has published data on tax expenditures in Latin America.

He said he also did not know of a standard for tax breaks. “As far as I know, there’s no unique and agreed standard or limit for what the overall size of tax expenditures should be.” 

 Dr Giulia Mascagni is research director at the International Centre for Tax and Development (ICTD) in the UK. She told us that while she could not speak directly to the cabinet secretary’s claim, she was not aware of a recommended standard. 

“I don’t think there is a generally agreed level of tax expenditures as a share of GDP that is ‘right’ or ‘optimal’.”

So what do countries spend on tax expenditures?

Kenya treasury building
Kenya’s National Treasury building is pictured in Nairobi on June 14, 2018. (Photo by Yasuyoshi Chiba/AFP)

De Renzio said he “would agree with the cabinet secretary that levels between 2% and 3% of GDP are very common across countries”, as shown in his data. 

Christian von Haldenwang, a senior researcher at the German Development Institute, is preparing a global database on tax expenditures that should be complete by the end of 2020. 

He said 17 African countries publish this data, with tax expenditures ranging from 0.6% of GDP for the Republic of Congo to 7.8% for Senegal. Kenya is not in the database as it does not publish information on tax breaks.

The average tax expenditures for the 17 countries is 2.9% of GDP – although this isn’t necessarily the full picture.  

In a 2018 blog, the CGD’s Gupta said tax concessions were 5% of GDP or more for a third of 34 countries listed. 

Are tax expenditures comparable?

Von Haldenwang cautioned against using the 2.9% figure as an average. 

“I would be reluctant to take this average or any other figure as a standard, let alone a good practice,” he said.  

“To start with, tax expenditures are always deviations from a benchmark tax system, and since every country has its own individual tax system, deviations from them are also highly case-specific.”

Gupta agreed that tax concessions were “not comparable” as different countries calculated them differently.  

What are the benefits of tax breaks?

Minister Yatani was on surer footing when he said the cost of tax concessions outweighed their benefit. 

It was “generally true” that many African and low-income countries granted more incentives they should, the ICTD’s Mascagni said.

“Often incentives are provided in a way that is not transparent or based on a clear economic rationale, and therefore represent a revenue loss that might not have a clear justification.” 

Gupta told Africa Check that countries should look to minimise these exemptions as they are often discretionary and outside the budgeting process.

Politics was a significant factor in tax breaks, Kenyatta University economist Dr Nelson Wawire said in a paper for the CGD.

“They are decided and agreed upon by parliament, without due regard to their effect on tax revenue,” he said. He added that they were often abused.

“Companies that operate within the tax-break window often close and move to different jurisdictions just before the full tax rate comes into effect, or frequently change names and start enjoying the tax holiday afresh as a new entity.” 

Conclusion: No ‘standard’ for tax expenditure – 2% of GDP or otherwise

Ahead of his June 2020 budget, Kenya’s treasury cabinet secretary Ukur Yatani said tax breaks would be rolled back because they reduced government revenue.  

The cost of concessions in “tax expenditures” for the treasury was about 6% of Kenya’s GDP, way more than the 2% “standard”, he said. 

Experts told Africa Check there wasn’t a global standard for tax expenditures. Tax concessions can’t be compared across countries, so an average would be meaningless.   

Kenya is one of many countries that do not publish data on tax expenditure. The International Monetary Fund has urged the country to do this to make its budget more transparent.

© Copyright Africa Check 2020. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.