Unproven that Hillbrow, nearby areas are ‘80% foreign national’ as claimed in much-shared video

Comments 4


80% of Johannesburg’s inner city is inhabited by foreign nationals

Source: Former police deputy minister Bongani Mkongi



Explainer: 2011 census data and a survey involving the provincial government shows far fewer people living in the inner city were born in another country

  • Attacks by mobs on foreign-owned businesses in South Africa’s economic heartland of Gauteng have sparked a major debate on the continent.
  • A news video where a former deputy police minister claims that the inner city in Johannesburg has been ‘surrendered’ to foreign nationals is racking views in the thousands, despite being from 2017.
  • But publicly available data, from Stats SA and a provincial survey does not back up this controversial claim, with more and better data needed.

In a video being shared briskly following a spate of attacks in South Africa by mobs targeting foreign-owned businesses, former deputy minister of police Bongani Mkongi claims that Johannesburg is “80% foreign nationals”.

This is “dangerous”, he declares before narrowing down the area of interest to “Hillbrow and the surrounding areas”.

But the video, which has racked up views by the hundreds of thousands, is not new. Mkongi made the controversial remarks in July 2017 while visiting the Hillbrow police station to discuss his concerns over crime and illegal trade. 

Despite this the video has been widely used to depict other situations, most recently in August 2019 following pitched battles between the police and street traders alleged to be foreign nationals in the Johannesburg CBD.

But does the claim by Mkongi stand up to closer scrutiny?   

Mayor Mashaba makes a close claim

A few weeks after Mkongi’s comments, Johannesburg mayor Herman Mashaba, made a variation of this claim, saying that “as many as 80%” of the residents of Johannesburg’s inner city were undocumented foreigners.

Africa Check fact-checked the mayor’s claim in September 2017 and found it to be incorrect, with at least three sources of data contradicting it. 

In response, the mayor’s office said that the statistic was from Mashaba’s “own experience” during raids of impaired or illegally occupied buildings in the inner city. 

City currently does not have accurate numbers

Robinson Sathekge is head of the City of Johannesburg’s migrant help desk.  He told Africa Check that currently, the city does not have any accurate numbers or percentages as to the number of migrants in the city or Hillbrow specifically.

The help desk seeks to ensure that immigrants feel they are part of an inclusive city. 

“The migrant help desk tried, without success, to tap into existing databases of the department of home affairs and only relies on the statistics produced through census by Statistics South Africa,” said Sathekge.

(Note: Africa Check has for weeks tried to get more details about documentation from the department. We will continue to do so.)

But only a census could yield such ward and suburb level data, Diego Iturralde, the head of demography at Stats SA told Africa Check.

Iturralde said that any claim about the make-up of a given neighbourhood “by any person is anecdotal and may or may not be true or may be temporal.” 

The most recent national census was in 2011. This had data on the foreign-born population of the city.

2011 census data on place of birth of Johannesburg inner city residents

SOURCE: SA 2011 Census, Wazimap 

None of the areas around Hillbrow shows an 80% foreign born population. (NOTE: Stats SA notes that being “foreign-born” and “foreign-national” are not the same. For example a foreign-born person may have become a citizen at the time of the census, or one may have been born elsewhere but be a citizen by descent.

The data agency added that while census data is widely used to estimate foreign-born residents, a shortcoming is that it takes place every 10 years, and major population changes may have since taken place. The next national count is set for 2021.

What do other data sources show?

We asked the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa on if they had data on this. They referred Africa Check to a recent presentation on the development and change of the Gauteng city-region over the last ten years. This was by Michael Sachs, an adjunct professor from the Southern Centre for Inequality Studies

Sach’s work drew extensively from that of the Gauteng City Region Observatory, a partnership between the universities of Johannesburg and the Witwatersrand as well as the Gauteng provincial government.

Every two years, the city observatory through a quality of life survey collects data to inform the development of cities in the province. The survey randomly samples resident adults in Gauteng. It “can provide a rough estimate for the proportion of the adult population resident in an area who migrated from another country,” the researchers told Africa Check

Survey of about 25,000 adults 

The observatory shared its most recent quality of life survey, which is for 2017/18. Some 24,889 adult respondents were surveyed across all 529 wards of Gauteng.

It showed that on average, “24.9% of respondents in wards in and around the Johannesburg inner city indicated that they migrated from another country.”

The Gauteng partnership says the survey is not able to track undocumented foreigners in the province. “However, the survey is able to provide various insights into the lives of self-reported migrants.” 

Share that reported migrating from another country

None of the reported percentages shows an 80% share. The available data does not support the claim by former deputy minister Mkongi. 

Conclusion: Current data does not support Johannesburg inner city is ‘80% foreign nationals’

 A widely shared claim from 2017 by the former deputy police minister Bongani Mkongi that Johannesburg’s inner city is “80% foreign nationals” is unsubstantiated by the available data. 

More data and research on foreign born – or foreign nationals – would help provide a better picture of the city’s population.

Further reading:


© Copyright Africa Check 2020. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Comment on this report

Comments 4
  1. By Shane

    Yes you cannot use the data of 2011 to prove whether it’s true or wrong rather come and see by yourself i thknk you may tend to agree with him.This is misleading as well it doesnt reflect the way things are be on the ground

    Reply Report comment
  2. By Sicelo

    Well if one wants to say Johannesburg is not city that is more of foreign national that mean they are blind and they speak from the office view they have to come to the ground before they can reject th claims as untrue

    Reply Report comment
  3. By Khathutshelo

    I totally disagree with your stats. Hillbrow and surrounding areas is congested with foreign nationals. Just move out from your comfort zone and take a sample around this places and will realize that you stats is untrue. I am staying at Hillbrow and i regularly visit the suburbs around the place, there are overwhelmed by the forein nationals. Go to the clinics and hospital around the places and check the stats, Do samples at schools around the places, speak to the teachers and they will give correct samples.

    Go to Yeoville every street corners is full of foreign nationals. Almost every building is commended by foreign nationals.

    Make a correct samples and you will realise that out of five people in the street of Hillbrow and surrondings 3-4 peoples are forein nationals.

    Reply Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.