South Africa’s education system is in a state of “crisis”, critics say. The World Economic Forum claims that the country is at the bottom of the class for the quality of its maths and science education. And there are concerns about high drop-out rates in schools with nearly half of all school pupils dropping out long before they can reach their matric year.
So how do you assess the country’s education system and what data is available?
No single dataset has the answers. Different assessments highlight different problems. Some are far less credible than others.This guide outlines and evaluates the datasets available for measuring the state of South Africa’s education system.
The Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality (SACMEQ)
SACMEQ is an international non-profit organisation which undertakes education policy research. It is made up of 15 education ministries from Botswana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Seychelles, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zanzibar, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
SACMEQ has conducted three major education policy research projects. The most recent data published by SACMEQ comes from a research project which ran from 2006 to 2011 and assessed 61,396 Grade 6 pupils and 8,026 Grade 6 teachers in 2,779 schools across 14 countries.
South Africa scored relatively low for both literacy and mathematics. South Africa came tenth for the reading ability of the pupils tested – behind Tanzania, Seychelles, Mauritius, Swaziland, Kenya, Zanzibar, Botswana, Zimbabwe and Namibia. Five countries – Uganda, Mozambique, Lesotho, Malawi and Zambia – fared worse than South Africa.
South Africa came eighth for mathematics behind Mauritius, Kenya, Tanzania, Seychelles, Swaziland, Botswana and Zimbabwe. Zanzibar, Mozambique, Uganda, Lesotho, Namibia, Malawi and Zambia scored lower in mathematics than South Africa.
SACMEQ did not identify any statistical improvement in South Africa’s Grade 6 mathematics and language performance between 2000 and 2007.
SACMEQ’s next research findings should be published later this year.
“SACMEQ and [Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study] stand out as being far better than anything else,” Martin Gustafsson, an economics researcher at Stellenbosch University, told Africa Check. “They are the only standardised measures of improvement over time. They are much better than anything else we have.”
Said Stephanie Allais, a senior researcher at the Centre for Researching Education and Labour at the University of the Witwatersrand: “It is important to benchmark ourselves against other African countries. What’s particularly useful about SACMEQ is that the teachers [also] have to write the tests, which they initially refused to do in South Africa.”
(SACMEQ’s second research project included a test for teachers. Due to teacher union objections, South Africa was one of the few countries that did not complete the section. The next SACMEQ study gave teachers an option to refuse to write the test. Out of 1,488 teachers, 245 refused to do so.)
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMMS)
TIMSS is a cross-national study that measures trends in mathematics and science achievement in Grade 8. It has been conducted every four years since 1995. The TIMSS results can be compared over time and between countries. It has been described as the “gold standard” when it comes to testing techniques.
In most countries, the TIMMSS test is taken by pupils in Grade 8. South Africa, Botswana and Honduras are exceptions, though. In all three countries, the test is taken by Grade 9 pupils because it was found to be too difficult for those in Grade 8.
In 2011, 48 countries participated in TIMSS. South Africa came 47th for mathematics and 48th for science. The Human Sciences Research Council noted that the “most proficient learners in South Africa approached the average performance in Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Republic of Korea, Japan, Finland, Slovenia and [the] Russian Federation”.
Annual National Assessments (ANA)
The ANA is a standardised national assessment introduced by the South African Department of Basic Education in 2011. It tests literacy and numeracy from Grade 1 through to Grade 6. Pupils in Grade 9 are also tested. The assessments are not designed to allow comparisons to be made between years.
There has been some controversy about the ANA data. For example Nic Spaull, an education researcher in the economics department at Stellenbosch University, described the changes in the average Grade 1 mathematics score – from 68% in 2012 to 59% in 2013, and then back to 68% in 2014 – as “impossible”.
Allais said that the ANA was a fledgling system that offers some insight into the troubles that have beset the schooling system.
“We know that our schools are dysfunctional. So what government is doing with the ANA is showing us the problems that need to be addressed. But you don’t fatten a pig by weighing it. We don’t need to know more and more about what’s wrong. You fatten a pig by feeding it. We already know what’s wrong with our system, what we’re not so good at is know how to fix it,” she explained.
She said that the ANA could be particularly useful if schools used it to identify and fix problems.
Annual matric results
The annual matric results often receive the most attention, but they provide limited insight into the state of the education system.
“Matric is telling us some useful things about our education system. It’s telling us that most kids are very weak and achieve very little,” said Allais.
Gustafsson said that the pass rate can be influenced by a number of factors: “The problem with it as a measure of improvement is that in general the pass rate will decline the more people you push through to Grade 12. Because when you push through more and more students the additional students tend to be poorer students and on average poorer students struggle to a greater degree in the examinations.”
He said that the pass rate could also be influenced by pupils’ subject choices.
The matric exam results also do not take into account the large numbers of school pupils who drop out long before their final year.
For every 100 pupils that started school in 2003, only 49 made it to matric in 2014, 37 passed and 14 qualified to go to university. Between Grade 10 and the final matric exams 500,000 pupils dropped out of the system.
World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report
The World Economic Forum’s education rankings make headlines every year. The Global Competitiveness Report for 2014–2015 placed South Africa’s math and science education last out of the 144 countries assessed.
But, as a ranking of education systems, the report is meaningless and offers no insight into the problems and challenges facing South Africa’s education system.
The ranking is not based on standardised, cross-national tests – as some of the other assesments are. Rather the ranking is based on an “Executive Opinion Survey”. This opinion survey is based on interviews with various unidentified “business leaders”.
Spaull has described the WEF ranking as “subjective, unscientific, unreliable and [lacking] any form of technical credibility or cross-national comparability”.
Allais said that the ranking system was incoherent and confused: “Maybe because the ranking comes from the World Economic Forum everyone thinks it is important. But of all the ranking systems it’s the least well thought through. The problem is that they don’t put it out as a perception index. They put it out as a ranking of education systems and it’s not that at all.”