Are 37.5% of jobless young S. Africans black women, and 31.5% white men?

The South African government recently claimed that young black women make up 37.5% of unemployed South Africans aged 15 to 34, and white men 31.5%. But it is really 49.1% and 1.1%.

In an employment plan presented to a recent G20 summit in Australia, the South African government claimed that young black women make up 37.5% of unemployed South Africans aged between 15 and 34, and white men 31.5%.

During the summit in Brisbane – where leaders of the G20 nations committed to increasing the number of women in the global workforce – South Africa listed the low employment rate of women in the country as one of its key challenges. It stated that South African women are more likely to be unemployed despite obtaining education levels that are the same or higher than men.

According to the country’s employment plan, 37.5% of South Africans aged between 15 and 34 who are currently unemployed, but not studying, are black women – compared to white men at 31.5%.

Are these figures correct?

49.1% vs 1.1%

Statistics South Africa conducts a quarterly labour force survey to measure employment levels. The latest results are for July to September of this year.

It showed that 3,677,561 black women between the ages of 15 and 34 were not employed or attending schools, universities or colleges during this period. This is just about half (49.1%) of the total for both genders and all races in this age bracket.

What about white males? Only 82,605 were classified as “unemployed, but not studying” in this time. This works out to a mere 1.1% of the total and a fraction of the 31.5% claimed in the South African government employment plan.

White women, Indian men second

But to use the composition of this unemployed group as a base of comparison is not really helpful – given that South Africa’s population includes four major race groups (black, Indian, white and coloured) that varies widely in number.

According to Stats SA’s midyear population estimate, the South African population included 8,057,561 black women between the ages of 15 and 34. Taken with the unemployment data, this means that almost one in two of the women in this group (46%) does not work or is not studying. This is the highest ratio of all the race groups and genders.

Stats SA determined that there were 603,917 white men in that age group in South Africa. This means that only one in seven (14%) was not working or a student, the lowest of all race groups and genders. Second lowest are white women and Indian men – both at 22% – with coloured women ranking second highest at 39%.

Race & gender Total population (15-34) Unemployed* %
Black male 8,187,887 2,892,127 35%
Black female 8,057,561 3,677,561 46%
White male 603,917 82,605 14%
White female 593,795 132,395 22%
Indian male 234,022 51,365 22%
Indian female 219,281 74,199 34%
Coloured male 810,492 260,793 32%
Coloured female 822,535 321,577 39%

* The official term is “not employed or in education/training (NEET)”

Conclusion: The claim is incorrect

The South African government is rightly worried about the exclusion of women from the job market, especially those between 15 and 34.

But in getting their numbers wrong, they skew the picture for policy makers. African women between the ages of 15 and 34 years constitute 49.1% of youth not employed or studying – not 37.5%. And the corresponding figure for white males is 1.1%, not 31.5%. Only one in seven white males are not employed or studying, but for black women this figure is nearly one in every two.

Edited by Julian Rademeyer


Additional reading

This report formed part of a global “fact-checkathon” of statements made at the G20 Leaders Summit in Australia. View the reports from the other eight fact-checking organisations here:
G20 fact-checkathon


© Copyright Africa Check 2020. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.