Little evidence that 10,000 children abused by sex tourism in Kenyan town

Comments 6


Over 10,000 children in Mtwapa used in sex tourism

Source: Citizen TV website (April 2018)



Explainer: The 2006 study that the claim was based on had significant flaws.

  • To highlight sex tourism at Kenya's coast a major TV station said 10,000 children are involved
  • We traced the number to a 2006 study co-authored by the UN and the Kenya government
  • But experts we spoke to say the methods used to calculate figure had significant flaws.

A report on the website of a large Kenyan TV station claimed that the children of Mtwapa, a coastal tourism town, were being sexually exploited.

Headlined “Over 10,000 children in Mtwapa used in sex tourism”, the April 2018 Citizen TV story attributed the “shocking numbers” to poverty and economic inequality.

Mtwapa lies 18 kilometres northeast of Mombasa, Kenya’s second-largest city.  Data from the 2009 census puts its population at about 50,000.

The town is popular with holidaymakers, but also often described as a centre of child sex tourism. Does the evidence back up this reputation?

A trail of claims

Citizen TV’s journalist referred us to a 2018 report by Terre des Hommes Netherlands, a charity that campaigns for children’s rights.

“It is estimated that in the coastal town of Mtwapa alone, between 10,000 and 20,000 children are trafficked annually for the purpose of sex tourism,” the organisation’s “rapid assessment report” noted.

The organisation told Africa Check it had erroneously attributed the statistic to a 2015 publication by the African Network for the Prevention and Protection Against Child Abuse and Neglect. But this study, which only focused on Nairobi, didn’t contain the number.

Tracing the claim back to its apparent source – by way of various non-governmental organisations – led Africa Check to a 2006 report authored by UN child agency Unicef and the Kenyan government.

The report is titled “The Extent and Effect of Sex Tourism and Sexual Exploitation of Children on the Kenyan Coast”. It is the most recent report Unicef has published on the subject, Catherine Kimotho, who focuses on child protection at the agency, told Africa Check.

The report claimed that “some ten to fifteen thousand girls living in [the] coastal areas of Malindi, Mombasa, Kilifi and Diani are involved in casual sex work – up to 30% of all 12-18 year olds living in these areas. A further two to three thousand girls and boys are involved in full-time year round commercial activity.”

This adds up to 18,000 children in sex work – but over a much wider area than just Mtwapa, which lies in Kilifi County.

How did Unicef arrive at its estimates?

Unicef’s study had initially intended to survey primary schools in the region, but failed to get official approval, the report said.

It then turned to four other methods to arrive at its estimate:  

  • Key informant interviews of 230 people, nearly half of them tourists.
  • Focus group discussions that included 23 interviews with persons and groups with specialised knowledge of the child sex trade.
  • Hourly recording of the number of tourists and children entering and exiting places where sex tourism was known to be common.
  • Diaries issued to girls under 18 who admitted to sex with tourists. Although 215 were distributed, only 84 were used in the study because most weren’t returned or were incomplete or falsified.

Respondents and focus group participants were asked to estimate the number of children in the sex industry. The researchers said they then compared these estimates to their own observations before using population data to make a “conservative assessment” of the extent of the trade.

But the report noted several challenges, including respondents’ reluctance to talk about the child sex trade because they feared a crackdown by officials in a region heavily dependent on tourism.

Counting ‘leaves a lot to be desired’

Experts told Africa Check that the methods the study used to estimate the population of child sex workers had significant weaknesses.  

“Out of all these methods, the only one that can acceptably give estimates was enumeration,”  said Dr Albert Manyuchi, a social scientist at the University of the Witwatersrand. “However, the way it was done leaves a lot to be desired.”

He explained that the Unicef researchers should have followed the counting with focused observations as well as a questionnaire that gathered information on the behaviour of the target population group.

‘Basically guessing’ number of children in sex trade

Andrew Carlson is an associate professor at Metropolitan State University in St Paul, Minnesota. He has worked on development communication for Unicef, and studied sex worker populations in South Africa around the 2010 World Cup.

The estimate of 10,000 children involved in sex work in Mtwapa at any given time was questionable, he said.

“A study like this, that is mostly qualitative in nature, is very good to describe the factors that lead to children being involved in the industry,” Carlson said. “But it wasn’t designed in a way that would yield a strong conclusion about the number of children involved.”

He explained that those interviewed “basically guess[ed] at how many children they know might be involved”.

“It may be that the 10,000 is the true number, but I would be very hesitant to make that claim based on the methodology of the Unicef report.”

Conclusion: Major flaws in study pointing to thousands of children in sex trade on Kenyan coast

Citizen TV claimed that “over 10,000” children were involved the sex trade in Mtwapa, a popular tourism town on the Kenyan coast.

The claim was based on a report that, in turn, eventually led to a 2006 Unicef study. This stated that up to 18,000 children were involved in the sex trade – along most of the Kenyan coast, not just in Mtwapa.

More than this, experts told Africa Check that the methods used to arrive at the figure had significant flaws. Child sex work is rightly a major concern for Kenya’s coastal region, but solutions to ending it have to be crafted using the right information.

  • Additional research by Lee Mwiti



Further reading:

© Copyright Africa Check 2020. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Comment on this report

Comments 6
  1. By Syed Ahmed

    Even if its 1000 or 10 or 1 child, its too much, the author of this report may have some ulterior motive for disregarding the UN report.

    Reply Report comment
  2. By Nu On

    There may be “little evidence” of 10,000 children abused by sex tourism in ONE town. But 10,000 children abused throughout all of Kenya? – Definitely believable.

    Also, forcing readers to spend ten times the amount of time doing a captcha then they do making an actual comment is unprofessional and suggests a lack of confidence in your readers.

    Reply Report comment
  3. By Mmy

    What? 12 years later that is your findings? You only point is to, somewhat belatedly, discredit the report?.. not acknowledging there is a problem?? 1 child is a problem. Solve it.

    Reply Report comment
  4. By Africa Check

    Our apologies for the problem in posting, and thank you for bringing it to our attention. We have every confidence in our readers!

    Reply Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.