Yes, South Africa spends as much on VIP protection & security as on land reform

Comments 1


VIP and security budget mirrors that of land reform

Source: DA head of policy Gwen Ngwenya (April 2018)



Explainer: 2018/2019 budget allocations are almost similar

  • VIP and security has been allocated R2.9 billion in 2018/2019
  • The amount set for land reform in same budget is R2.7 billion
  • Experts say important to note that land reform also includes restitution

Compensation for land has “never in fact been prioritised in national budgets previously”, Gwen Ngwenya, the head of policy for the Democratic Alliance, said recently.

Ngwenya was speaking at a policy debate on land expropriation without compensation at the University of South Africa, where she pushed back on the argument that compensation would be a financial burden on the state.

She referred to a recent report by the Institute of Race Relations which, she said, showed that the government spent around R2.6 billion on VIP protection and security services.

“That’s an amount that almost mirrors the amount that is currently allocated towards land reform,” Ngwenya said.

A reader brought this claim to our attention, so we checked the data.

How much has been set aside for land reform?

“At the end of the current financial year, according to the 2018/2019 national budget, expenditure on VIP Protection … will amount to R2.6 billion,” the think-tank noted in its report, published in March 2018.

The report defined VIP protection as “VIP Protection Services, Presidential Protection Services, Static and Mobile Security and the 21 (VIP) Squadron”.

The total allocated to the department of rural development and land reform in the 2018/2019 financial year is R10.4 billion, according to budget data from the national treasury.

The amount is spread across the department’s programmes, which include administration, rural development and restitution. The land reform programme has been allocated R2.7 billion.

Department of rural development and land reform budget (2018/19)

Programme Budget
Administration R1.8 billion
National geomatics management services R690 million
Rural development R1.8 billion
Restitution R3.4 billion
Land reform R2.7 billion
Total R10.4 billion

Source: National Treasury

What does the land reform budget cover?

Ruth Hall, a professor at the University of the Western Cape’s Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies explained to Africa Check what the land reform budget line covers.

“The land reform budget funds government’s acquisition of land and redistribution of land, as well as efforts to secure people’s rights to land,” she said.

How much is set aside for VIP protection & other security?

The South African Police Service (SAPS) has been allocated R91.8 billion for the 2018/2019 financial year. Of this, R2.9 billion has been earmarked for the protection and security services programme.

According to the treasury, this programme is tasked with protecting local and foreign dignitaries. It also evaluates security for national key points and some strategic installations.

The programme’s VIP protection services has been allocated R1.5 billion.

South African police budget (2018/2019)

Programme Budget
Administration R19.4 billion
Visible policing R46.9 billion
Detective services R18.8 billion
Crime intelligence R3.8 billion
Protection and security services R2.9 billion
Total expenditure estimates R91.8 billion

Source: National Treasury

Figures from the 2018/2019 budget allocations on land reform (R2.7 billion) and protection and security services (R2.9 billion) support Ngwenya’s claim.

Land reform includes restitution

But more context is needed. While the land reform line item is R2.7 billion, land restitution is an additional R3.4 billion.

“Government’s commitment to land reform includes restitution,” Hall said.

So while Ngwenya’s claim for spending on land reform is technically correct, it does exclude the amount allocated to restitution.

“The restitution budget funds primarily two things. It funds the acquisition of land and residential property to restore it to people who were dispossessed [of it] in the past,” Hall said.

“But it also funds cash compensation to land claimants. And we know that the majority of claims have been settled with cash compensation to date.”

Hall added that the restitution budget also funded the commission on restitution of land rights, responsible for investigating and processing restitution claims.

Land reform budget has ‘fallen by 32%’

Hall highlighted that the land reform budget had indeed been reduced in recent years. “Between 2007/8 and 2014/15 the land reform budget has fallen by 32%,” she said.

“In 2007 to 2008 the budget allocation to land reform was at 0.9% of the national budget. It’s never been above 1%. By 2014/15 it had dropped to 0.5% of the national budget.”

Conclusion: Government 2018/2019 spending on land reform nearly as much as on VIPs & protection

At a debate on land expropriation without compensation, the Democratic Alliance’s head of policy, Gwen Ngwenya, said the South African government has not prioritised compensation in recent budgets.

To illustrate this, she said the government’s current land reform budget mirrored that of its spend on VIP and protection services.

In its 2018/2019 financial year, the national treasury has set aside R2.7 billion for land reform and R2.9 billion for protection and security services.

While this supports Ngwenya’s claim, she may have overlooked that restitution is also part of the government’s land reform effort.   


Further reading:

© Copyright Africa Check 2020. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Comment on this report

Comments 1
  1. By P vd Westhuizen

    If lands is given for free and taken without compensation, there’s no need for a budget. It is quite obvious that the land reform and also restitution, was never intended to come into effect in a democratic fashion. The game plan is clear. Mr Ramapoza, quite rightly, refered to boiling a frog in a pot, slowly turning the heat up to hide the fact that he will be boiled alive.

    So, there’s no need for a budget if the plan was always to take ground and land by force.
    As George Orwell remarked “All tyranies rule by fraud or force, but once the fraud is exposed, they must rely exclusively on force.”

    Reply Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.