Risenga Maluleke COMMENT: Statistician-general clarifies South Africa’s migrant estimates

South Africa’s statistician-general Risenga Maluleke explains how Stats SA estimates the number of migrants living in the country - and why it’s important that public debate is based on such empirical data.

There is an unfortunate perception that South Africa has more migrants than estimated by Statistics South Africa, with recent reports claiming that 11 million undocumented migrants live in the country.

In terms of the United Nations principles of official statistics, I have as statistician-general the responsibility and obligation of responding to the misuse or misreporting of official statistics.

Migrant numbers in three census counts

South Africa’s statistician-general, Risenga Maluleke.

Stats SA has run three censuses since the start of democratic government in South Africa, with the next census scheduled for 2021. The number of people born outside the country were estimated at 958,188 in Census 1996, 1.03 million in Census 2001 and 2.2 million in Census 2011.

It is important to note that the population census enumerates all people within the borders of South Africa, irrespective of their citizenship or migratory status. The count also includes people living in institutions such as old-age homes and hostels, as well as the homeless population.

As part of the census’s migration module, we ask the province or country of birth, the date they moved to South Africa and their country of citizenship. We don’t ask about the documented status of an individual. It is not the mandate of Stats SA to determine whether people born outside South Africa are documented or not.

After each census, Stats SA conducts a post-enumeration survey. Its main goal is to evaluate the completeness of census coverage and to provide adjustments factors to compensate for any incompleteness.

In the 2011 Census an undercount of 14.6% was observed; the post-enumeration survey allowed adjustments to be made to compensate for this. These measures ensure complete coverage of the population enumerated in South Africa, including migrants.

Migration significant driver of population change

In analysing the population count, the age and sex structure, and cohort analysis, needs to be considered. Together with this are the demographic factors of fertility and mortality and their specific rates.

While births and deaths are considered the main drivers of population change in some populations, migration – internal and international – continues to be significant. Gauteng is the province with the lowest total fertility rates, but shows the highest population growth rates.

Fertility and mortality are defined and measured through the natural events of birth and death. Migration, however, is more complex because its movements are not universal, may or may not occur, and can occur repeatedly.

No distinction between legal status of foreign-born people

On the basis of data emanating from the census, another key Stats SA product is the mid-year population estimates. The 2018 estimates show that net immigration into South Africa from 2016 to 2021 is likely to be 1.02 million people.

Most international migrants settle in Gauteng (47.5%) and the least in the Northern Cape province (0.7%). Gauteng is considered the economic hub of the country, attracting both international migrants and domestic migrants from rural provinces such as Limpopo, KwaZulu-Natal and the Eastern Cape.

The input data used for the population estimates makes no distinction between the legal status of foreign-born people in South Africa. It must be noted that if assertions about the high number of migrants (such as 11 million) were true, we would notice a spike in death registration in the age groups to which migrants belong (mostly 20 to 39) as well as in births registered to women in these age groups. But this demographic footprint is not noticeable in the most recent birth and death registration data.

So how many migrants are there in South Africa?

Comparison to other data sources and triangulation of data is a statistical practice to add value to existing official statistics.

The United Nations Population Division estimated that in 2015 there were about 3.15 million foreign-born people in South Africa and in 2017 there were 4 million. Similar estimates have been produced by the Global Knowledge Partnership on Migration and Development (KNOMAD) unit of the World Bank.

Using Census 2011 as well as the mid-year population estimates, Stats SA estimates that there are approximately 4 million foreign-born people in South Africa at this point in time. (Note: Data from the 2016 Community Survey has been the subject of a review by Stats SA and will be used to improve future data collection.)

Looking at Gauteng, the mid-year population estimates indicate that the province’s average annual population growth rate was 2.6% in the 2016-17 period, higher than the 1.58% growth nationally in the same period. In the five major Gauteng municipalities we see growth in Sedibeng (+1.84%), West Rand (+1.5%), City of Ekurhuleni (+2.1%), City of Johannesburg (+2.97%) and City of Tshwane (+3%).

While the metros of Johannesburg and Tshwane show growth at almost double the national rate, this is not exceedingly high for regions in the economic and administrative hub of the country.

A further source of triangulation of data refers to the Zimbabwean special dispensation permit the department of home affairs provided in 2010 to regularise the status of Zimbabweans in South Africa. The 2011 Census took place a year later, and its results – of 672,308 Zimbabweans living in South Africa – were very comparable to that of this initiative.

Better migration data means better public debate

Looking forward, Stats SA plans to collect more migration data more regularly by placing migration modules in various surveys as well as exploring administrative data from various sources more frequently.

We are also committed to working with stakeholders to ensure quality data is made available in order for policy to be based on empirical data – and for public discourse to evolve on the same basis.

 

Further reading:


 

© Copyright Africa Check 2018. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.