Back to Africa Check

Brace for water cuts in South Africa? No, news of drought funds scandal is old

South Africa is approaching 50 days of lockdown meant to contain the coronavirus. Its people “need to now brace for water cuts and higher tariffs going forward as the R220 million allocated for drought relief went ‘missing’”.

That’s the claim in a graphic posted on Facebook on 12 May 2020. So far, it’s been viewed more than 25,000 times.

The graphic includes a screenshot of an eNCA TV news report. Text on the screen reads: “R220M DROUGHT RELIEF MISSING.”

But the news is old.

Investigation launched in 2017

The eNCA news report is from 5 February 2019 – more than a year ago. It covers a press conference in which Nomusa Dube-Ncube, head of cooperative governance and traditional affairs in the KwaZulu-Natal provincial government, discusses an investigation into missing funds.

In 2015, the national government gave the province more than R350 million to help farmers during a severe drought.

TimesLive reported in June 2017 that commercial farmers’ organisation Agri-SA had “approached the Public Protector and the auditor-general to investigate what happened to millions of rand in state drought relief funds allocated for distressed farmers”.

Three months later Themba Mthembu, then the head of the KwaZulu-Natal agriculture department, announced a forensic investigation into how R200 million of the drought relief budget had been spent.

In her February 2019 press conference, Dube-Ncube said the investigation had not been concluded.

But the R220 million did not go missing in May 2020, which the graphic does not make clear, and there have been no official announcements of “water cuts and higher tariffs going forward”. – Mary Alexander


Republish our content for free

We believe that everyone needs the facts.

You can republish the text of this article free of charge, both online and in print. However, we ask that you pay attention to these simple guidelines. In a nutshell:

1. Do not include images, as in most cases we do not own the copyright.

2. Please do not edit the article.

3. Make sure you credit "Africa Check" in the byline and don't forget to mention that the article was originally published on

For publishers: what to do if your post is rated false

A fact-checker has rated your Facebook or Instagram post as “false”, “altered”, “partly false” or “missing context”. This could have serious consequences. What do you do?

Click on our guide for the steps you should follow.

Publishers guide

Africa Check teams up with Facebook

Africa Check is a partner in Meta's third-party fact-checking programme to help stop the spread of false information on social media.

The content we rate as “false” will be downgraded on Facebook and Instagram. This means fewer people will see it.

You can also help identify false information on Facebook. This guide explains how.

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
limit: 600 characters

Want to keep reading our fact-checks?

We will never charge you for verified, reliable information. Help us keep it that way by supporting our work.

Become a newsletter subscriber

Support independent fact-checking in Africa.