Does S. Africa really employ more civil servants than the US? The claim is false

Comments 6

The size of South Africa's civil service has increased dramatically in recent years. But are there really more civil servants in SA than in the United States, as has been said? The claim is false.

Does South Africa employ more civil servants than the United States of America, a country with one of the largest economies in the world and a population of 319 million?

The claim crops up frequently in tweets, blog posts and comment pieces.

Even Business Times columnist Stephen Mulholland weighed in on the subject last year in a piece headlined, “An orgy of jobs for bureaucratic pals”. “We have more people on the state payroll than the US, which has a population six times the size of ours and a gross domestic product (GDP) some 45 times bigger than ours,” Mulholland claimed. A News24 contributor described the South African civil service as “the largest gravy train ever seen in Africa”.

There are very real concerns about the size of South Africa’s government bureaucracy but does it really eclipse that of the United States?

2.161 million SA civil servants

Statistics South Africa (StatsSA) tracks employment in South Africa in both private and public sectors.

According to its June 2014 Quarterly Employment Statistics (QES) survey, there were 455,701 national government employees, a further 1,118,748 people working for provincial authorities, 311,361 people were employed by local authorities and 275,851 employees worked for “other government institutions” like libraries, parks, zoos and education and training authorities. This adds up to a grand total of 2.161-million civil servants.

Ten times more

US President Barack Obama addresses a "town hall meeting" at the University of Johannesburg on June 29, 2013. Photo: AFP/Saul Loeb
US President Barack Obama addresses a “town hall meeting” at the University of Johannesburg on June 29, 2013. Photo: AFP/Saul Loeb

So how does Uncle Sam’s workforce compare? The US Bureau of Labour Statistics conducts a monthly survey as part of its Current Employment Statistics (CES) programme. Around 144,000 businesses and government agencies are included.

We calculated the average US employment numbers for April, May and June 2014 and compared them to StatsSA data. An average of 2.123-million people worked for the US federal government during that time. A further 5.063-million people worked in 50 state governments and 14.108-million were employed by local authorities. (We excluded the US Postal Service from the count, as StatsSA does not categorise South African Post Office workers as government employees.)

That left us with a US tally of 21.294-million civil servants – almost ten times the corresponding number for South Africa.


Comparing raw numbers does not tell the whole story.

When President Jacob Zuma announced a new cabinet in May this year, which included a number of new ministers, deputy ministers and government departments, it was described as “bloated”, “a monster” and “a waste of money“.

Compared to former president Thabo Mbeki’s second term, when there were 28 ministers, Zuma’s current cabinet consists of 35 ministers and 37 deputies.

Unsurprisingly, new ministries and portfolios have over the years added to South Africa’s civil service bill which grew by a staggering 145.6% between 2005 and 2012, according to a study conducted by economists Adèle Breytenbach and Jannie Rossouw.

Inflation accounted for only a portion of this rise. The per capita income of civil servants went up too, top management earned more relative to middle management and the number of government employees climbed by 27.3%. (In contrast, public sector employment in the US increased by 2% during the same period.)

Breytenbach and Rossouw concluded: “[R]ecent growth trends in civil service remuneration are unsustainable, as similar future growth will not be affordable from an economic perspective. A continuation of the recent growth trend will ‘crowd-out’ other public sector spending priorities.”

The freezing of unfilled civil service jobs – as government is supposedly contemplating at the moment – will not be enough to turn the tide, Breytenbach and Rossouw warned.

Commenting on the recent Quarterly Employment Statistics survey, Dr Azar Jammine – the chief economist at Econometrix – wrote: “[E]mployment creation by means of public sector agencies is not a permanent solution to the country’s vast unemployment problem. In the longer term, such a policy is bound to result in huge fiscal strains.”

Conclusion: The claim is false

Data from Statistics South Africa and the US Bureau of Labour Statistics shows that South Africa’s public sector is almost ten times smaller than that of the US: 2.161-million government employees compared to 21.294-million.

But the raw numbers belie disturbing trends. Between 2005 and 2012 the number of South African government employees increased by more than a quarter, whereas numbers grew by only 2% in the US. There are certainly real concerns about long-term sustainability.

Edited by Julian Rademeyer

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this report referred to Stephen Mulholland as a Business Day columnist. He was in fact a Sunday Times Business Times columnist. His column appeared first in Business Times and was republished on the Business Day website.

© Copyright Africa Check 2020. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Comment on this report

Comments 6
  1. By Edward

    This is ANC bogus propaganda. SA may have 2 million but that is .03 of a population of 55 million that has 45% unemployment. America has 21million of 355 million which is .05% of the population which has only 4% unemployment. Also the numbers quoted for SA do not include all the parastatels, police and municipal employees and the army.

    Reply Report comment
  2. By Mike Dannatt

    According to stats South Africa, the number has risen to something short of 3 million. How many of these are eligible for a state pension, how much does/will it cost and is that figure sustainable?

    Reply Report comment
  3. By Nasdaq7

    Go check those numbers today now that Zuma has this week left office. What a disgrace, the man was a Communist – he called all his friends and allies “comrade”. Plus top marginal personal income taxes are now 45%.

    Reply Report comment
  4. By Petrus Steenkamp

    LIke any other civilized country the South-African government requires civil servants to carry out the duties the people of the country has requested of them . The problem with the South-African civil service is the same as elsewhere ( not the size) but the number of mid and high level workers who gain huge incomes without providing useful services to the public.

    THere is nothing especially strange about our civil service and considering our jobless rate it should probably be expanded to employ all the people the private sector can’t find a way to exploit for sufficient profit

    The South-African figures looks about right to me and like the US figures it excludes the military which would add more than 2 million to the US figures. The top marginal income rate was 95% in the USA for decades running and there was as much communism there as here.

    The commentators here could all have benefited by reading more history before trying to slander the scholars.

    Reply Report comment
  5. By Alwyn Schoeman

    Your analysis is flawed.

    You should compare the percentages of each individual service to each other and take into account context.

    For example:
    The US has a much bigger military than South Africa. There is a reason for that.
    The US has 1000 times more military veterans than South Africa. It justifies a much bigger service infrastructure to care for.
    The US agriculture is many times that of South Africa, thus more service infrastructure.

    You should compare the numbers based on responsibility and portfolio of services that comes with it.

    As usual your analysis is superficial and devoid of investigative thinking.

    Reply Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.