Kruger elephant poaching incident is not ‘the first in more than ten years’

Has South Africa's Kruger National Park lost only one elephant to poachers "in well over ten years", as claimed in a recent SANParks press release? The claim is incorrect.

South Africa’s parks authority, SANParks, recently announced that the country’s Kruger National Park had suffered its “first confirmed elephant poaching incident…in well over ten years”.

News of the incident, which occurred in Pafuri in the northern part of the park, spread quickly. “South Africa’s Kruger Park loses first elephant,” read an article on the National Geographic website. South Africa’s News24 site took a similar line with the headline: “First Kruger elephant poached in ten years”. Reuters news agency reported that “South Africa loses first elephant to poachers in a decade“. Bloomberg News was a little more circumspect, reporting: “South Africa says first Kruger elephant poached in ten years”.

So how true is the claim? A reader asked us to investigate.

‘Greatest crisis in decades’ for Africa’s elephants

A government ivory stockpile in Zimbabwe: Photo: AFP/Desmond KwandeWhile South Africa has certainly been at the centre of Africa’s rhino poaching crisis – with 2,829 rhino reportedly killed by poachers there since 2010 – its elephant populations have escaped largely unscathed.

Elsewhere on the continent, the picture is bleak. Since 2011, when elephant poaching hit the highest levels on record in ten years, the slaughter has continued unabated. Now, between 25,000 and 35,000 elephants are reportedly being killed in Africa every year for their tusks. To the east of the Kruger Park – in Mozambique – thousands of elephants have been poached.

Africa’s elephants are facing their “greatest crisis in decades”, according to an inter-agency “rapid response assessment” published  last year.

So is it possible that the Kruger National Park has lost only one elephant to poachers in “well over ten years”?

Data records other poaching incidents

Data collected as part of the MIKE programme – which was established under the auspices of the international Convention on Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) to monitor the illegal killing of elephants – suggests otherwise. A recent MIKE report indicates that poachers killed a total of at least three elephants in Kruger during the course of 2007, 2009 and 2011. (Note: The Kruger data appears on the second last page of the report. The number of elephants killed illegally is expressed as a percentage of the total number of elephant carcasses discovered.)

There are also anecdotal reports of Kruger elephants being killed after crossing the border into Mozambique.

Kruger elephant ‘targeted for its ivory’

A SANParks ranger takes part in a night patrol exercise in the Kruger National Park. Photo: AFP/Stephane de SakutinKen Maggs, the head of SANParks’s environmental crime investigations unit, confirmed to Africa Check this week that the MIKE data was “correct apart from 2011 where we have two [incidents] recorded”.

“All these animals were indeed poached… but according to evidence found at these scenes were not, we believe, purposely killed for the ivory but rather accidently or rather opportunistically killed by snares set by snare poachers targeting other larger ‘bush meat’ animals like buffalo, hippo.

“The recent Pafuri elephant was however believed to have been the first elephant in many years that was targeted for its ivory, possibly when the poaching group, looking for rhino, failed to locate a rhino and shot the elephant before departing the park,” Maggs said.

Conclusion – The claim is incorrect

The claim in the SANParks media release that the recent incident in the Kruger National Park is the “first confirmed elephant poaching incident…in well over ten years” is incorrect. Other elephants have fallen prey to poachers in recent years. And while those killings may have been “opportunistic” or “accidental”, they  are still classed as “illegal killings” or poachings.

According to Maggs, the most recent incident differs from the others in that the evidence clearly indicates the animal was “purposely killed” for its tusks. That is certainly alarming and calls into question the wisdom of South African environment minister Edna Molewa’s controversial claim that, “We did an ivory once-off sale and elephant poaching has not been a problem since.”

SANParks should have explained the context of the recent incident in their press release and announced that – for the first time in many years – they had discovered the carcass of an elephant that appeared to have been specifically targeted for its tusks. And media organisations should have checked the SANParks press release against the available data before reporting it as fact.

Note: An earlier version of this report mistakenly attributed the Reuters headline to the National Geographic website article. We have updated it to correct this. 

Edited by Peter Cunliffe-Jones

© Copyright Africa Check 2020. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.