Zuma promised 98 new schools would be completed by March 2013

Comments 2

In his State of the Nation address earlier this year, South Africa’s president, Jacob Zuma, promised that a total of 98 new schools would be completed by the end of March 2013. The promise was false.

This Africa Check report was originally published in May 2013. As of July 2013, the African National Congress (ANC) continues to claim that 49 “mud schools” were replaced by the department of basic education in 2012. The claim is false. See the update at the end of the report.

In his State of the Nation address earlier this year, South Africa’s president, Jacob Zuma, promised that a total of 98 new schools would be completed by the end of March 2013.

More than forty “mud schools” situated in the impoverished Eastern Cape province would be replaced, he said. (See our earlier report)

Has it happened? Was it a realistic promise to make?

Promise made despite construction backlogs

Huge backlogs in the construction of new schools to replace older “unsafe” ones are meant to be addressed by the “schools infrastructure backlog grant” which was introduced in the 2011/2012 financial year.

The grant was intended to replace 395 “mud schools”, provide water to 1257 schools, sanitation to 868 and electricity to a further 878 schools.

However, according to the department of basic education’s annual performance plan, published on 13 March 2013, to date only “12 unsafe schools have been replaced, 106 schools have been provided with water, 144 schools with sanitation and 118 with electricity”.

As the National Treasury makes clear, there has been massive under-spending of the backlog grant.

Underspent grant funds had been redirected

The Treasury’s 2012 medium-term budget statement noted that: “As a result of slow spending on the schools infrastructure backlogs grant, R7.2 billion has been taken away from this programme over the medium term. These funds will be used to increase the education infrastructure grant to provinces and the community library grant, and to support the construction of new universities in Mpumalanga and the Northern Cape.”

A report by Equal Education, an organisation advocating for “quality and equality in South African education”, found that the department of basic education spent “approximately R76 million of the R700 million allocated for the 2011/12 financial year” and “ by the end of the 3rd quarter approximately R400 million of the R2,3-billion allocated for the 2012/13 financial year” had been spent.

Contracts terminated for “non-performance”

The department claimed in its performance plan that: “The rate of delivery of infrastructure has been hampered by structural problems common to all departments especially those in the social sector.”

Basic education spokesman, Panyaza Lesufi, told Africa Check that “experience has proved that it takes a minimum of six months to plan and 12 to 18 months to construct a school. This in the main resulted in low expenditure in the first two years of the programme.”

He said that five contracts affecting the construction of 30 schools were terminated “due to non-performance or liquidation”.

Were schools promised by Zuma built?

In his address, the president claimed that “a total of 98 new schools will have been built by the end of March, of which more than 40 are in the Eastern Cape that are replacing mud schools”.

His promise was made just six weeks before the end of March.

On 12 April 2013, while addressing a community in Libode in the Eastern Cape, the minister for basic education, Angie Motshekga, acknowledged they had failed to meet the commitment: “We pledged to deliver 49 schools to the region by the end of March and we currently stand at 17, with 10 of them from the Libode District alone,” she said.

Explaining this, she added: “The major reason for this shortfall has been the liquidation of one of the contractors who was building 12 schools and the termination of another’s contract. Our implementing agents are in the process of appointing new contractors to complete the outstanding schools, which on average are currently at 85% completion. I’m happy and confident to say that we will soon be announcing the completion of those schools as well.”

Of the 98 promised only “60 schools completed”

According to Lesufi, spokesman for the department of basic education, only 60 of the 98 schools referred to by Zuma have now been completed and 29 of them are in the Eastern Cape.

He said nineteen schools in the Eastern Cape had been “completed and handed over” to communities. Ten other schools had yet to be “handed over”, he said, but were complete and classrooms were being used by pupils.

Echoing minister Motshekga’s claim, Lesufi said that the 49 schools in the province were “85.8%” complete. How that percentage is arrived at was not explained and Lesufi ignored a question requesting information about the locations of the schools making it hard to verify. It would appear the department has not made public a list of the schools and their addresses.

The department’s performance plan states that as a result of the “initial implementation delays…all planned projects will now be completed over a five-year period instead of three years”. A budgeted amount of R2.5 billion has now been “rescheduled” to the 2015/16 financial year.

Conclusion: Zuma’s promise was not kept

It is unclear whether Zuma knowingly made a promise he knew he could not keep. Lesufi this week sidestepped a question about whether Zuma had been provided with incorrect information by the department.

It is clear, however, that Zuma’s claim that 98 schools would have been built by the end of March this year was not true and the department was well aware of that at the time of his speech.

Zuma is of course not the first to make false promises about the schools backlog. Nine years ago, President Thabo Mbeki claimed: “By the end of this year we shall ensure that there is no pupil learning under a tree, mud school or any dangerous conditions that expose pupils and teachers to the elements.” The same promise has been echoed by various ministers, provincial premiers and MECs over the years.

In a recent article in the Sunday Times, Doron Isaacs, the deputy general secretary for Equal Education summarised some of these claims and referred to them as a “tradition of mud school make-believe”. Motshekga may have fallen into the same trap. In April this year she claimed that “we have committed to the eradication of mud schools by the end of 2014/15”. That also seems unlikely.

Edited by Peter Cunliffe-Jones

In a press statement on the outcomes of an ANC national executive committee meeting held from 19 to 21 July 2013, the organisation’s secretary-general, Gwede Mantashe, claimed: “New schools have been built and continue to be built with special attention being given to the eradication of mud schools. 49 mud schools were replaced in 2012 and a total 101 is targeted in 2013.”

The 49 schools Mantashe was referring to form part of the department of basic education’s accelerated schools infrastructure delivery initiative. Its purpose is to eradicate 496 “inappropriate” schools and provide a basic level of water, sanitation and electricity to schools. Forty-nine schools were meant to be replaced in 2011/2012 financial year. (See slide 4 of the department’s presentation to a parliamentary standing committee on 19 October 2012)

The presentation revealed that only four out of the 49 schools had reached “practical completion”. It stated that the “remaining 45 of 49 are planned to be handed over during the October, November and December months”.

On 20 February 2013 the department stated that “16 of the 49 schools have reached practical completion and [had been] handed over”. (See slide 12)

On 4 June 2013, in a quarterly report on its performance in meeting its strategic objectives for 2012/13, the department said that “17 of the 49 school have reached practical completion and [have been] handed over”. (See slide 83)

© Copyright Africa Check 2020. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Comment on this report

Comments 2
  1. By Doron Isaacs

    It is important to note that the first 49 or 50 schools were due to be completed by end March 2012, not 2013. http://bit.ly/YtZ03l (See slide 4. By end March 2013 the first 100 schools should have been completed.) Lately the DBE have been speaking as if they revised the deadline of the first 49 schools to end March 2013. If so, they didn’t tell anyone. Moreover, as your article shows they haven’t even met the revised deadline.

    Panyasa Lesufi, DBE spokesperson, claims that “60 of the 98 schools referred to by Zuma have now been completed and 29 of them are in the Eastern Cape.” These numbers would appear to have no basis in reality. Have they been checked?

    Lesufi says in the Eastern Cape 19 schools have been “handed over” and 10 others are “complete” and being at least partially “used”. However the latest report to Parliament claims only that only four schools are complete and that 10 have reached “practical completion”. See here http://bit.ly/12ebkNE.

    Doron Isaacs – Deputy General Secretary – Equal Education.

    Reply Report comment
  2. By Jon Pienaar

    Considering there are 20,000 schools that Nick Spaull has described as “dysfunctional” — ie. churning out functionally illiterate and innumerate graduates in their thousands — 98 schools are a drop in the ocean.

    We need thousands of schools to be replaced, upgraded and fixed. The Arms Deal money would have paid for that. The Nuclear Deal money could pay for that.

    Sadly, that won’t happen.

    Reply Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.