Yes, Kenya’s executive takes the lion’s share of funds – but not 95%


95% of Kenya’s budget resources go to the executive

Source: Abdikadir Mohamed (September 2018)



Explainer: Executive got 52% of Kenya’s total budget in 2017/18

  • Former presidential adviser Abdikadir Mohamed said Kenya’s executive arm of government gets 95% of the country’s funds.
  • This is only true for the funds set aside for the three arms of the government: the executive, legislature and judiciary.
  • But out of the total funds in Kenya’s national budget, the executive got a 52% share in 2017/18.

Battling to make ends meet, Kenya’s treasury recently increased taxes and slashed budgets, adding fuel to a national debate about the state of the country’s finances.

Parliament is not too costly as often alleged, former presidential adviser Abdikadir Mohamed said on a September 2018 current affairs talkshow. A constitutional lawyer, Mohamed is also a former legislator.

He said Kenya would save more money if it trimmed spending by the executive – the arm of government responsible for the daily management of a country.

“What is relevant is that the majority, 95%, of [budget] resources go to the executive,” Mohamed said.

Kenya’s constitution sets out the three main arms of the state as:

  • Parliament and the legislatures in 47 county governments
  • The national executive and the executive structures in the counties
  • The judiciary and independent tribunals  

Is almost all of Kenya’s budget gobbled up by its executive arm of government?

National budget also covers salaries and debt

The only beneficiaries of the budget are the executive, judiciary and parliament, Mohamed told Africa Check. In this context the executive was, of the three, the biggest drain on the country’s coffers.

But is his estimate true for the whole budget, which not only funds the three arms of government but also covers obligations such as salaries and debt repayments?

Even when “looking at the global figure… the whole budget”, the executive took the lion’s share, Mohamed said.

KSh2.1 trillion spent in 2017/18 financial year

In its most recent full expenditure report, Kenya’s treasury said the country spent KSh2.11 trillion in the 2017/18 financial year. The three arms of the government accounted for more than half (KSh1.14 trillion) of this:

Kenya: 2017/18 spending by the three arms of government
Executive (ministries, state departments and agencies) KSh1.1 trillion
Parliament (national assembly, senate and the Parliamentary Service Commission) KSh26.7 billion
Judiciary (including the Judicial Service Commission) KSh13.6 billion
Total KSh1.14 trillion

Source: Quarterly Economic and Budgetary Review, August 2018

In this table, the executive’s share of the budget for the three arms of government is 96.5%.

Money first set aside for compulsory payments

The national government’s income is collected into what is known as the consolidated fund. The fund first provides for payments it is obliged to make, such as debt repayments, salaries for some state officers and pensions. Only then are the government’s three arms given their spending budgets.

This is according to John Kinuthia, lead research analyst at the International Budget Partnership Kenya. The organisation works to provide information on budget spending to ordinary citizens.

“First of all, we take off the things that are like statutory payments that we have to do as a first charge on the consolidated fund, and completely get them out of the shareable revenue,” Kinuthia told Africa Check.

These initial payments are known as consolidated fund services. What remains is then shared between the national government and the 47 counties, Kinuthia said.

Executive spending in the 2017/18 financial year

Kenya’s budget spending for 2017/18 was KSh2.11 trillion. The executive’s share of this was 52%. Counties took KSh306.2 billion (14.5%) while KSh395.8 billion (18.7%) was used to pay debt.  

Source: National Treasury

(Note: The Parliamentary Service Commission is included in parliament’s budget, and the Judicial Service Commission in the judiciary’s budget. They are therefore excluded from the budget for other independent commissions.)

The 2018/19 budget estimates provide the executive with 46% of the total spend, or KSh1.411 trillion.

The estimates set aside KSh962.5 billion for consolidated fund services, with the bulk of it, KSh870.6 billion, marked as public debt.

Why the executive budget is large

Kimani Ichung’wah chairs the parliamentary committee that oversees budgeting. He told Africa Check that the executive’s broad mandate and its staffing meant it would have the biggest bill of the three arms of the government.

“Resources follow functions. There are more functions in the executive arm of government than in the other arms of government.”

He said subsidies in education, maternal health, security spending and transport and energy infrastructure also came out of the executive budget.

Conclusion: Kenya’s executive takes largest share of budget, but not 95%

Former presidential adviser Abdikadir Mohamed claimed Kenya spent 95% of its money on the government’s executive arm. This left little over for the other two arms, the judiciary and the legislature.

In 2017/18 the executive received 96.5% of the funds set aside for the three arms of the government. But the national budget is bigger than this, paying for other obligations such as salaries, pensions and debt.

Mohamed is right that the executive takes the lion’s share of resources, but that share is not as high as 95%. In the 2017/18 financial year the executive received 52% of the total budget, while in 2018/19 it will get a lower amount of 46%.

Edited by Lee Mwiti

Further reading:


© Copyright Africa Check 2019. Read our republishing guidelines. You may reproduce this piece or content from it for the purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events. This is subject to: Crediting Africa Check in the byline, keeping all hyperlinks to the sources used and adding this sentence at the end of your publication: “This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website", with a link back to this page.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Africa Check encourages frank, open, inclusive discussion of the topics raised on the website. To ensure the discussion meets these aims we have established some simple House Rules for contributions. Any contributions that violate the rules may be removed by the moderator.

Contributions must:

  • Relate to the topic of the report or post
  • Be written mainly in English

Contributions may not:

  • Contain defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or harassing language or material;
  • Encourage or constitute conduct which is unlawful;
  • Contain material in respect of which another party holds the rights, where such rights have not be cleared by you;
  • Contain personal information about you or others that might put anyone at risk;
  • Contain unsuitable URLs;
  • Constitute junk mail or unauthorised advertising;
  • Be submitted repeatedly as comments on the same report or post;

By making any contribution you agree that, in addition to these House Rules, you shall be bound by Africa Check's Terms and Conditions of use which can be accessed on the website.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.